Back to Search
Start Over
Population susceptibility: A vital consideration in chemical risk evaluation under the Lautenberg Toxic Substances Control Act
- Source :
- PLoS Biology, Vol 17, Iss 8, p e3000372 (2019), PLoS biology, vol 17, iss 8, PLoS Biology
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2019.
-
Abstract
- The 2016 Frank Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (Lautenberg TSCA) amended the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to mandate protection of susceptible and highly exposed populations. Program implementation entails a myriad of choices that can lead to different degrees of public health protections. Well-documented exposures to multiple industrial chemicals occur from air, soil, water, food, and products in our workplaces, schools, and homes. Many hazardous chemicals are associated with or known to cause health risks; for other industrial chemicals, no data exist to confirm their safety because of flaws in 1976 TSCA. Under the 2016 Lautenberg amendments, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must evaluate chemicals against risk-based safety standards under enforceable deadlines, with an explicit mandate to identify and assess risks to susceptible and highly exposed populations. Effective public health protection requires EPA to implement the Lautenberg TSCA requirements by incorporating intrinsic and extrinsic factors that affect susceptibility, adequately assessing exposure among vulnerable groups, and accurately identifying highly exposed groups. We recommend key scientific and risk assessment principles to inform health-protective chemical policy such as consideration of aggregate exposures from all pathways and, when data are lacking, the use of health-protective defaults.<br />The Toxic Substances Control Act legally oversees the over 40,000 chemicals in the United States; however, this Perspective article maintains that the US Environmental Protection Agency’s chemical evaluation plans do not reflect current science, recommending methods to improve evaluations to protect public health.
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
Maternal Health
Toxicology
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Medical and Health Sciences
Fluorides
0302 clinical medicine
Pregnancy
Contaminants
Agency (sociology)
Medicine and Health Sciences
2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment
Public and Occupational Health
Aetiology
Biology (General)
Materials
Methylenes
education.field_of_study
General Neuroscience
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Chemical Safety
Chemical Engineering
Biological Sciences
3. Good health
Industrial Chemicals
Chemistry
Perspective
Physical Sciences
Engineering and Technology
Mandate
Public Health
Patient Safety
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Risk assessment
Conservation of Natural Resources
medicine.medical_specialty
QH301-705.5
Materials Science
Population
Biology
Safety standards
Risk Assessment
Hazardous Substances
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
03 medical and health sciences
Chlorides
Hazardous waste
Environmental health
medicine
Humans
United States Environmental Protection Agency
education
Toxicity
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
General Immunology and Microbiology
business.industry
Public health
Chemical Compounds
Biology and Life Sciences
Chemical industry
Hydrocarbons
United States
030104 developmental biology
13. Climate action
Women's Health
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Developmental Biology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15457885
- Volume :
- 17
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLOS Biology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7740735c8948697a86d0f16d7a7149b3
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000372