Back to Search Start Over

Magnetic resonance elastography increases usefulness and safety of non‐invasive screening for esophageal varices

Authors :
Nobuaki Matsui
Kubota Kazumi
Toshihiro Misumi
Takaomi Kessoku
Yuji Ogawa
Nobutaka Fujisawa
Atsushi Nakajima
Yasushi Honda
Satoru Saito
Wataru Tomeno
Kento Imajo
Masato Yoneda
Source :
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 33:2022-2028
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

Background and aims The Baveno VI criteria enable non-invasive screening for esophageal varices. However, these criteria were established based on studies examining a large proportion of patients with viral hepatitis and relatively few patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Furthermore, because vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) has a high incidence of measurement error, improved criteria are needed. We aimed to develop criteria based on magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) even among patients with NAFLD. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of patients who had undergone MRE and/or VCTE as well as an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The patients were classified as having either a low risk or a high risk of varices. The optimal cut-offs for ruling out esophageal varices were calculated for the MRE and VCTE liver stiffness measurement (LSM), the platelet count in an estimation cohort, and the cut-offs were then evaluated using validation cohorts composed of patients who had undergone only MRE or VCTE. Results The study included 627 patients (39% with NAFLD). The optimal cut-off values for the MRE-LSM and the platelet count were 4.2 kPa and 18.0 × 104 /μL, respectively. An MRE-LSM of 4.2 kPa plus a platelet count of 18.0 × 104 /μL had a negative predictive value of 1.00 for both low-risk plus high-risk varices as well as for high-risk varices in a validation cohort, enabling the presence of varices to be ruled out. Conclusions Magnetic resonance elastography might enable a safer avoidance of screening endoscopy, with a smaller measurement error, among patient populations with a high prevalence of NAFLD.

Details

ISSN :
14401746 and 08159319
Volume :
33
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....77802c1533e9fa5884116d198111ff44