Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires:The LVQOL and VCM1
- Source :
- De Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, De Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & Van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : The LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-248 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, de Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, de Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : the LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-48 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-48. Springer Netherlands, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-248. Springer Netherlands
- Publication Year :
- 2006
-
Abstract
- The Low Vision Quality of Life (LVQOL) questionnaire and the Vision-related Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) are two of the many vision-related quality of life (QOL) questionnaires that have been developed in recent years. Although psychometric properties of the LVQOL and VCM1 compare well with other vision-related QOL questionnaires, construct and longitudinal validity have not been assessed (adequately). The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of these questionnaires by testing specific pre-specified hypotheses about the relations of these questionnaires with other measures. The percentage of hypotheses regarding the cross-sectional construct validity that were refuted for the LVQOL was 22% for the basic aspects of vision subscale, 50% for the mobility subscale, 39% for the adjustment subscale and 17% for the reading and fine work subscale. For the VCM1 this percentage was 57%. For the longitudinal construct validity the percentage of hypotheses that were refuted ranged from 33 to 75% for the LVQOL subscales and was 50% for the VCM1. In conclusion, cross-sectional construct validity was satisfactory for the LVQOL subscales, but seemed poor for the VCM1. In addition, the longitudinal validity of these scales was poor to moderate.
- Subjects :
- Male
Psychometrics
Cross-sectional study
Research Support
Developmental psychology
Quality of life
Surveys and Questionnaires
80 and over
Journal Article
Humans
Validation Studies
Non-U.S. Gov't
Quality of Life Research
Aged
Netherlands
Aged, 80 and over
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Construct validity
Visually Impaired Persons
Low vision
Cross-Sectional Studies
SDG 1 - No Poverty
Quality of Life
Female
Construct (philosophy)
Psychology
Clinical psychology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09629343
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- De Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, De Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & Van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : The LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-248 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, de Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, de Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : the LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-48 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-48. Springer Netherlands, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-248. Springer Netherlands
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....77b4836f71d371cadd5ba85d7d2e4357
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9