Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires:The LVQOL and VCM1

Authors :
H. J. M. Völker-Dieben
Caroline B. Terwee
Annette C Moll
M.R. de Boer
G.H.M.B. van Rens
H.C.W. de Vet
Methodology and Applied Biostatistics
EMGO+ - Quality of Care
VU University medical center
CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
Ophthalmology
Source :
De Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, De Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & Van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : The LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-248 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, de Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, de Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : the LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-48 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-48. Springer Netherlands, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-248. Springer Netherlands
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

The Low Vision Quality of Life (LVQOL) questionnaire and the Vision-related Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) are two of the many vision-related quality of life (QOL) questionnaires that have been developed in recent years. Although psychometric properties of the LVQOL and VCM1 compare well with other vision-related QOL questionnaires, construct and longitudinal validity have not been assessed (adequately). The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of these questionnaires by testing specific pre-specified hypotheses about the relations of these questionnaires with other measures. The percentage of hypotheses regarding the cross-sectional construct validity that were refuted for the LVQOL was 22% for the basic aspects of vision subscale, 50% for the mobility subscale, 39% for the adjustment subscale and 17% for the reading and fine work subscale. For the VCM1 this percentage was 57%. For the longitudinal construct validity the percentage of hypotheses that were refuted ranged from 33 to 75% for the LVQOL subscales and was 50% for the VCM1. In conclusion, cross-sectional construct validity was satisfactory for the LVQOL subscales, but seemed poor for the VCM1. In addition, the longitudinal validity of these scales was poor to moderate.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09629343
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
De Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, De Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & Van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : The LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-248 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, de Boer, M R, Terwee, C B, de Vet, H C W, Moll, A C, Völker-Dieben, H J M & van Rens, G H M B 2006, ' Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires : the LVQOL and VCM1 ', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 233-48 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-48. Springer Netherlands, Quality of Life Research, 15(2), 233-248. Springer Netherlands
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....77b4836f71d371cadd5ba85d7d2e4357
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9