Back to Search Start Over

Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test

Authors :
Ronald D. Cohn
Michal Inbar-Feigenberg
Christoph Licht
Sarah Bowdin
Dimitri J. Stavropoulos
Rosanna Weksberg
Gregory Costain
Sharon D. Dell
Cheryl Shuman
Wilson W L Sung
Rebekah Jobling
Ronald M. Laxer
Regan Klatt
Giovanna Pellecchia
Stacy Hewson
Zhuozhi Wang
Cyrus Boelman
Saadet Mercimek-Andrews
Anath C. Lionel
Roberto Mendoza-Londono
M. Stephen Meyn
Linda T. Hiraki
Rayfel Schneider
Nasim Monfared
Robin Z. Hayeems
Susan Walker
Christian R. Marshall
Komudi Siriwardena
Jonathan B. Kronick
Melissa T. Carter
Jonathan D. Wasserman
Priya Dhir
Neal Sondheimer
Stephen W. Scherer
Peter N. Ray
Thomas Nalpathamkalam
Dawn Cordeiro
Earl D. Silverman
Michael J. Szego
S. Mohsen Hosseini
Elise Heon
Ajoy Vincent
Andreas Schulze
James J. Dowling
Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram
Peter Bikangaga
Joanne Sutherland
Heather MacDonald
Cheryl Cytrynbaum
Daniele Merico
Raveen K. Basran
Tino D. Piscione
O. Carter Snead
Miriam S. Reuter
Chris Carew
Source :
Genetics in Medicine
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2018.

Abstract

Purpose Genetic testing is an integral diagnostic component of pediatric medicine. Standard of care is often a time-consuming stepwise approach involving chromosomal microarray analysis and targeted gene sequencing panels, which can be costly and inconclusive. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a comprehensive testing platform that has the potential to streamline genetic assessments, but there are limited comparative data to guide its clinical use. Methods We prospectively recruited 103 patients from pediatric non-genetic subspecialty clinics, each with a clinical phenotype suggestive of an underlying genetic disorder, and compared the diagnostic yield and coverage of WGS with those of conventional genetic testing. Results WGS identified diagnostic variants in 41% of individuals, representing a significant increase over conventional testing results (24% P = 0.01). Genes clinically sequenced in the cohort (n = 1,226) were well covered by WGS, with a median exonic coverage of 40 × ±8 × (mean ±SD). All the molecular diagnoses made by conventional methods were captured by WGS. The 18 new diagnoses made with WGS included structural and non-exonic sequence variants not detectable with whole-exome sequencing, and confirmed recent disease associations with the genes PIGG, RNU4ATAC, TRIO, and UNC13A. Conclusion WGS as a primary clinical test provided a higher diagnostic yield than conventional genetic testing in a clinically heterogeneous cohort.

Details

ISSN :
10983600
Volume :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Genetics in Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....78de18969f97867df7734393ef4728c8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.119