Back to Search Start Over

Coronavirus disease (COVID 2019): protocol for a living overview of systematic reviews

Authors :
Qian Zhang
Tingting Lu
Long Ge
Kehu Yan
Yihui Wang
Qi Wang
Honghao Lai
Xiuxia Li
Yue Ruan
Liangying Hou
Lian Chen
Tianzhu Qin
Bei Pan
Cuncun Lu
Yunhua Wang
Source :
Annals of Palliative Medicine. 10:1488-1493
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
AME Publishing Company, 2021.

Abstract

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to grow worldwide, and systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) on COVID-19 can efficiently guide evidence-based clinical practice. However, SRs/MAs with weaknesses can mislead clinical practice and pose harm to patients, and too many useless SRs/MAs could pose confusion and waste sources. A "living" overview of SRs/MAs aims to provide an open, accessible and frequently updated resource summarizing the highest-level evidence of COVID-19, that can help evidence-users to quickly identify trusted evidence to guide the practice. This study aims to systematically give an overview SRs/MAs of COVID-19, assess their quality, and identify the best synthesis of evidence. Methods Databases including Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM) and WanFang were systematically searched on May 1, 2020 using relevant terms for identify SRs/MAs related to COVID-19. The study selection, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed by independent reviewers, and results will be crosschecked. The authoritative tools (AMSTAR-2, PRISMA and its extensions) will be used to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of included SRs/MAs, and potential influence factors will be explored. The consistency of conclusions will be compared among reviews and the best evidence will be summarized. In addition, we will conduct exploratory meta-analyses (MAs) of individual studies when applicable. Data will be reported as number with (or) percentage, risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) according to the specific results. R3.6.1 and Microsoft Excel 2016 will be used to analyze and manage data. Results The results of this overview will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Discussion In this study, we will present for the first time, an overview of SRs/MAs, which provides a comprehensive, dynamic evidence landscape on prevalence, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of COVID-19.

Details

ISSN :
22245839 and 22245820
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Palliative Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....79be21011b14c397602b8d759dba0b86
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-20-1130