Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: Standard vs. line-to-line cementation techniques. A biomechanical in-vitro study involving six osteoporotic pairs of human cadaver femurs

Background Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) potentially offers advantages compared to conventional THA, including sparing bone and soft tissue and being a facilitated and less traumatic implantation. However, the indication is limited to patients with sufficient bone quality. Cemented short-stem THA might provide an alternative to conventional cemented THA. To date, no cemented short stem is available on the market. Methods In the present in vitro study, primary stability of a new cemented short stem was evaluated, comparing standard (undersized stem) versus line-to-line (same-sized stem) cementing techniques, using six pairs of human cadaver femurs. Primary stability, including reversible micromotion and irreversible migration, was assessed in a dynamic material-testing machine. Fracture load was tested and fracture pattern analyzed. Findings Both cementation techniques (standard vs. line-to-line) displayed comparable results with respect to primary stability without any statistical differences (micromotion: 17.5 μm vs. 9.6 μm (p = 0.063); migration: 9.5 μm vs. 38.2 μm (p = 0.188)). Regarding fracture load, again, no difference was observed (3670 N vs. 3687 N (p = 0.063)). In all cases, proximal fractures of Vancouver type B3 occurred. Interpretation The present in vitro study demonstrates that the line-to-line cementation technique, which is favourable regarding the philosophy of short stem THA, can be further pursued in the course of the development of a cemented short stem. Further investigations should address how well the cemented short stem compares to well-established cemented straight-stem designs.