Back to Search
Start Over
Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 2, p e0227899 (2020), PLoS ONE
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) provides biennial immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening for people aged 50–74 years. Previous work has quantified the number of colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths prevented by the NBCSP and has shown that it is cost-effective. With a 40% screening participation rate, the NBCSP is currently underutilised and could be improved by increasing program participation, but the maximum appropriate level of spending on effective interventions to increase adherence has not yet been quantified. Objectives To estimate (i) reductions in CRC cases and deaths for 2020–2040 attributable to, and (ii) the threshold for cost-effective investment (TCEI) in, effective future interventions to improve participation in the NBCSP. Methods A comprehensive microsimulation model, Policy1-Bowel, was used to simulate CRC natural history and screening in Australia, considering currently reported NBCSP adherence rates, i.e. iFOBT participation (∼40%) and diagnostic colonoscopy assessment rates (∼70%). Australian residents aged 40–74 were modelled. We evaluated three scenarios: (1) diagnostic colonoscopy assessment increasing to 90%; (2) iFOBT screening participation increasing to 60% by 2020, 70% by 2030 with diagnostic assessment rates of 90%; and (3) iFOBT screening increasing to 90% by 2020 with diagnostic assessment rates of 90%. In each scenario, we estimated CRC incidence and mortality, colonoscopies, costs, and TCEI given indicative willingness-to-pay thresholds of AUD$10,000-$30,000/LYS. Results By 2040, age-standardised CRC incidence and mortality rates could be reduced from 46.2 and 13.5 per 100,000 persons, respectively, if current participation rates continued, to (1) 44.0 and 12.7, (2) 36.8 and 8.8, and (3) 31.9 and 6.5. In Scenario 2, 23,000 lives would be saved from 2020–2040 vs current participation rates. The estimated scenario-specific TCEI (Australian dollars or AUD$/year) to invest in interventions to increase participation, given a conservative willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD$10,000/LYS, was (1) AUD$14.9M, (2) AUD$72.0M, and (3) AUD$76.5M. Conclusion Significant investment in evidence-based interventions could be used to improve NBCSP adherence and help realise the program’s potential. Such interventions might include mass media campaigns to increase program participation, educational or awareness interventions for practitioners, and/or interventions resulting in improvements in referral pathways. Any set of interventions which achieves at least 70% iFOBT screening participation and a 90% diagnostic assessment rate while costing under AUD$72 million annually would be highly cost-effective (
- Subjects :
- Male
Colorectal cancer
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Psychological intervention
Colonoscopy
Geographical Locations
Feces
0302 clinical medicine
Cancer screening
Medicine and Health Sciences
Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Early Detection of Cancer
Multidisciplinary
Cost–benefit analysis
medicine.diagnostic_test
Mortality rate
Incidence (epidemiology)
Middle Aged
Adenomas
Intestines
Oncology
Occult Blood
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Comparators
Colonic Neoplasms
Engineering and Technology
Female
Colorectal Neoplasms
Cancer Screening
Research Article
Referral
Death Rates
Science
Oceania
Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
Digestive System Procedures
03 medical and health sciences
Population Metrics
Diagnostic Medicine
Environmental health
Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
Humans
Aged
Colorectal Cancer
Population Biology
business.industry
Australia
Cancers and Neoplasms
Biology and Life Sciences
medicine.disease
People and Places
Electronics
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 15
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLOS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7a4cf6151fed414c888ea88cd41cb729
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227899