Back to Search
Start Over
Validation of a rapid attribution of the May/June 2016 flood-inducing precipitation in France to climate change
- Source :
- Journal of Hydrometeorology, 19(11), 1881-1898. American Meteorological Society, Journal of Hydrometeorology, Journal of Hydrometeorology, American Meteorological Society, 2018, 19 (11), pp.1881-1898. ⟨10.1175/JHM-D-18-0074.1⟩, Philip, S, Kew, S F, van Oldenborgh, G J, Aalbers, E, Vautard, R, Otto, F, Haustein, K, Habets, F & Singh, R 2018, ' Validation of a rapid attribution of the May/June 2016 flood-inducing precipitation in France to climate change ', Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1881-1898 . https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0074.1, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2018, 19 (11), pp.1881-1898. ⟨10.1175/JHM-D-18-0074.1⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- The extreme precipitation that resulted in historic flooding in central-northern France began 26 May 2016 and was linked to a large cutoff low. The floods caused some casualties and over a billion euros in damage. To objectively answer the question of whether anthropogenic climate change played a role, a near-real-time “rapid” attribution analysis was performed, using well-established event attribution methods, best available observational data, and as many climate simulations as possible within that time frame. This study confirms the results of the rapid attribution study. We estimate how anthropogenic climate change has affected the likelihood of exceedance of the observed amount of 3-day precipitation in April–June for the Seine and Loire basins. We find that the observed precipitation in the Seine basin was very rare, with a return period of hundreds of years. It was less rare on the Loire—roughly 1 in 20 years. We evaluated five climate model ensembles for 3-day basin-averaged precipitation extremes in April–June. The four ensembles that simulated the statistics agree well. Combining the results reduces the uncertainty and indicates that the probability of such rainfall has increased over the last century by about a factor of 2.2 (>1.4) on the Seine and 1.9 (>1.5) on the Loire due to anthropogenic emissions. These numbers are virtually the same as those in the near-real-time attribution study by van Oldenborgh et al. Together with the evaluation of the attribution of Storm Desmond by Otto et al., this shows that, for these types of events, near-real-time attribution studies are now possible.
- Subjects :
- Pollution
Atmospheric Science
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Flood myth
media_common.quotation_subject
0208 environmental biotechnology
Flooding (psychology)
Climate change
02 engineering and technology
[SDU.STU.ME]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Meteorology
01 natural sciences
020801 environmental engineering
Climate models
13. Climate action
Climatology
SDG 13 - Climate Action
Environmental science
Climate model
Precipitation
[SDU.STU.HY]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Hydrology
Attribution
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
media_common
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1525755X and 15257541
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7ab3622f0477e2b7eedc142bd1f11491
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-18-0074.1