Back to Search
Start Over
Too much medicine? Scientific and ethical issues from a comparison between two conflicting paradigms
- Source :
- BMC Public Health, BMC Public Health, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2019)
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- BioMed Central, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background The role of medicine in society appears to be focused on two views, which may be summarized as follows: “Doing more means doing better” (paradigm A) and “Doing more does not mean doing better” (paradigm B). Main body I compared paradigms A and B both in terms of a single clinical condition and in the general context of a medical system. For a single clinical condition, I analyzed breast cancer screening. There are at least seven interconnected issues that influence the conflict between paradigms A and B in the debate on breast cancer screening: disconnection between research and practice; scarcity of information given to women; how “political correctness” can influence the choice of a health policy; professional interests; doubts about effectiveness; incommensurability between harms and benefits; and the difficulty in making dichotomous decisions with discrete variables. As a general approach to medicine, the main representative of paradigm A is systems medicine. As representatives of paradigm B, I identified the following approaches or movements: choosing wisely; watchful waiting; the Too Much Medicine campaign; slow medicine; complaints against overdiagnosis; and quaternary prevention. I showed that both as a single condition and as a general approach to medicine, the comparison was entirely reducible to a harm-benefit analysis; moreover, in both cases, the two paradigms are in many respects incommensurable. This transfers the debate to the ethical level; consequently, scientists and the public have equal rights and competence to debate on this subject. Moreover, systems medicine has many ethical problems that could limit its spread. Conclusion I made some hypotheses about scenarios for the future of medicine. I particularly focused on whether systems medicine would become increasingly accessible and widespread in the population or whether it would be downsized because its promises have not been maintained or ethical problems will become unsustainable.
- Subjects :
- Systems Analysis
Debate
media_common.quotation_subject
Population
Harm-benefit assessment
030209 endocrinology & metabolism
Breast Neoplasms
Systems Analysi
Risk Assessment
Scarcity
Conflict, Psychological
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Medicine
Humans
Conflict (Psychology)
Ethics, Medical
Ethic
030212 general & internal medicine
Overdiagnosis
education
Breast cancer screening
Competence (human resources)
Health policy
Early Detection of Cancer
media_common
Ethics
education.field_of_study
Evidence-Based Medicine
business.industry
lcsh:Public aspects of medicine
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
lcsh:RA1-1270
Paradigm
Systems medicine
Incommensurability
Engineering ethics
Female
Disconnection
Biostatistics
business
Breast Neoplasm
Human
Too much medicine
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14712458
- Volume :
- 19
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC Public Health
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7acc0e26e5536cba9e128af5f96a5cd8