Back to Search Start Over

Utilization and perceived problems of online medical resources and search tools among different groups of European physicians

Authors :
Manfred Gschwandtner
Allan Hanbury
Matthias Samwald
Veronika Stefanov
Marlene Kritz
Source :
Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol 15, Iss 6, p e122 (2013)
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Background: There is a large body of research suggesting that medical professionals have unmet information needs during their daily routines. Objective: To investigate which online resources and tools different groups of European physicians use to gather medical information and to identify barriers that prevent the successful retrieval of medical information from the Internet. Methods: A detailed Web-based questionnaire was sent out to approximately 15,000 physicians across Europe and disseminated through partner websites. 500 European physicians of different levels of academic qualification and medical specialization were included in the analysis. Self-reported frequency of use of different types of online resources, perceived importance of search tools, and perceived search barriers were measured. Comparisons were made across different levels of qualification (qualified physicians vs physicians in training, medical specialists without professorships vs medical professors) and specialization (general practitioners vs specialists). Results: Most participants were Internet-savvy, came from Austria (43%, 190/440) and Switzerland (31%, 137/440), were above 50 years old (56%, 239/430), stated high levels of medical work experience, had regular patient contact and were employed in nonacademic health care settings (41%, 177/432). All groups reported frequent use of general search engines and cited “restricted accessibility to good quality information” as a dominant barrier to finding medical information on the Internet. Physicians in training reported the most frequent use of Wikipedia (56%, 31/55). Specialists were more likely than general practitioners to use medical research databases (68%, 185/274 vs 27%, 24/88; χ 2 2 =44.905, P

Details

ISSN :
14388871
Volume :
15
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of medical Internet research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7b059a50e78567c72d79ed523c778b2b