Back to Search Start Over

Sensitivity of multi-parametric MRI to the compressive state of the isolated intervertebral discs

Authors :
Delphine Périé
Yann-Guirec Manac'h
Guillaume Gilbert
Gilles Beaudoin
Source :
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 31:36-43
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

Objective Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers great potential as a sensitive and noninvasive technique for describing the alterations in mechanical properties, as shown in vitro on intervertebral disc (IVD) or cartilage tissues. However, in vivo, the IVD is submitted to complex loading stimuli. Thus, the present question focuses on the influence of the mechanical loading during an MRI acquisition on the relaxation times, magnetization transfer and diffusion parameters within the IVD. Methods An apparatus allowing the compression of isolated IVDs was designed and manufactured in acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. IVDs were dissected from fresh young bovine tail, measured for their thickness and submitted to compression just before the MRI acquisition. Six discs received 0% (platen positioned at the initial disc thickness), 5% (platen positioned at 95% of the initial disc thickness), 10%, 20% and 40% deformation. The MRI parameters were compared between the loading states using mean and standard deviation for T1 and T2, and matrix subtraction for Magnetization Transfer, fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient. Results The compression of the IVD did not lead to any significant change of the MRI parameters, except for the diffusion that decreased in the direction of the compressive stress. Discussion This experimental in vitro study shows that multi-parametric MRI on isolated discs in vitro is not sensitive to compression or to the partial confined relaxation that followed the compression.

Details

ISSN :
0730725X
Volume :
31
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7b5b95c490e96c25f3cb73f177e87060
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.008