Back to Search Start Over

Assay Reproducibility and Interindividual Variation for 15 Serum Estrogens and Estrogen Metabolites Measured by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Authors :
Larry K. Keefer
Louise A. Brinton
Gretchen L. Gierach
Timothy D. Veenstra
Barbara J. Fuhrman
Xia Xu
Roni T. Falk
Regina G. Ziegler
Barry I. Graubard
Cher M. Dallal
Source :
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 23:2649-2657
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2014.

Abstract

Background: Interindividual differences in estrogen metabolism may partially account for differences in risks of estrogen-responsive cancers. We conducted a proof-of-performance study to assess the reproducibility of a LC/MS-MS method for measurement of 15 serum estrogens and metabolites (all 15 termed EM) in total (conjugated+unconjugated) and unconjugated forms and describe interindividual variation. Methods: Interindividual variation in serum EM profiles was evaluated for 20 premenopausal women, 15 postmenopausal women, and 10 men. Replicate aliquots from 10 premenopausal women, 5 postmenopausal women, and 5 men were assayed eight times over 4 weeks. Components of variance were used to calculate coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: In postmenopausal women and men, median EM concentrations were similar and substantially lower than that in premenopausal women. Within each sex/menopausal group, the sum of all EM varied 5- to 7-fold across extreme deciles. Some EM had greater variation; total estrone varied approximately 12-fold in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Unconjugated estradiol varied 17-fold in postmenopausal women but only 5-fold in premenopausal women and men. CVs reflecting variation across replicate measures for individuals were 99% for all EM in each group. Conclusions: The serum EM assay has excellent laboratory reproducibility. In premenopausal women, postmenopausal women, and men, interindividual variation in EM measures is substantially greater than laboratory variation. Impact: The serum EM assay is suitable for epidemiologic application. See all the articles in this CEBP Focus section, “Biomarkers, Biospecimens, and New Technologies in Molecular Epidemiology.” Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(12); 2649–57. ©2014 AACR.

Details

ISSN :
15387755 and 10559965
Volume :
23
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7bae47049cb67f5287e1f5fe83d1e2e9
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0438