Back to Search Start Over

Etanercept in the Longterm Treatment of Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

Authors :
Jean Sibilia
Désirée van der Heijde
Raimon Sanmartí
Joseph Wajdula
Carlo Salvarani
Joachim Sieper
Paul Emery
Laurence Paolozzi
Marjatta Leirisalo-Repo
Emilio Martin Mola
Filip Van den Bosch
Markku Hakala
Ben Dijkmans
Sjef van der Linden
Chemistry and Biology
Rheumatology
CCA - Innovative therapy
Source :
Dijkmans, B A C, Emery, P, Hakala, M, Leirisalo-Repo, M, Mola, EM, Paolozzi, L, Salvarani, C, Sanmarti, R, Sibilia, J, Sieper, J, van den Bosch, F A J, Van der Heijde, D M, van der Linden, S C & Wajdula, J 2009, ' Etanercept in the Longterm Treatment of Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis ', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1256-1264 . https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.081033, Journal of Rheumatology, 36(6), 1256-1264. Journal of Rheumatology
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
The Journal of Rheumatology, 2009.

Abstract

Objective.To evaluate the 2-year efficacy and safety of etanercept in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Methods.A 96-week open-label extension study, which followed a 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial, was designed to provide longterm efficacy and safety data, including radiographic outcomes, for patients treated with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (NCT00421980). In all, 81 patients were enrolled (96% of the participants from the double-blind study). Key efficacy measures included improvement using the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20% (ASAS20) criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Radiographic progression was evaluated using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) method. Paired t tests were used to test within-group changes from baseline.Results.The percentage of responders, by ASAS20 criteria, remained relatively constant in patients who received etanercept during the 12-week double-blind study (60% at Week 0 and 83% at Week 96 of the open-label extension); more patients from the placebo group became responders after being switched to etanercept (23% and 74%, respectively). A similar trend was also observed using the ASAS40 and ASAS5/6 criteria, the BASFI, and the BASDAI. Most patients had no change from baseline in mSASSS values. Etanercept was well tolerated; the most frequent adverse events were injection site reactions (n = 30; 37.0%) and headache (n = 18; 22.2%), and the most frequent infections were upper respiratory tract infections (n = 43; 53.1%) and flu syndrome (n = 22; 27.2%).Conclusion.For 2 years, etanercept was clinically effective and well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings.

Details

ISSN :
14992752 and 0315162X
Volume :
36
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of Rheumatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7c20aa9757ec2b7a817bb037f7064a9f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.081033