Back to Search Start Over

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Selective Cytopheretic Device in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Authors :
James A Tumlin
Claude M Galphin
Ashita J Tolwani
Micah R Chan
Anitha Vijayan
Kevin Finkel
Balazs Szamosfalvi
Devasmita Dev
J Ricardo DaSilva
Brad C Astor
Alexander S Yevzlin
H David Humes
SCD Investigator Group
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 8, p e0132482 (2015), PLoS ONE
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2015.

Abstract

Objective Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a highly morbid condition in critically ill patients that is associated with high mortality. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) in the treatment of AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design, Setting, Patients A randomized, controlled trial of 134 ICU patients with AKI, 69 received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) alone and 65 received SCD therapy. Results No significant difference in 60-day mortality was observed between the treated (27/69; 39%) and control patients (21/59; 36%, with six patients lost to follow up) in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Of the 19 SCD subjects (CRRT+SCD) and 31 control subjects (CRRT alone) who maintained a post-filter ionized calcium (iCa) level in the protocol’s recommended range (≤ 0.4mmol/L) for greater or equal to 90% of the therapy time, 60-day mortality was 16% (3/19) in the SCD group compared to 41% (11/27) in the CRRT alone group (p = 0.11). Dialysis dependency showed a borderline statistically significant difference between the SCD treated versus control CRRT alone patients maintained for ≥ 90% of the treatment in the protocol’s recommended (r) iCa target range of ≤ 0.4 mmol/L with values of, 0% (0/16) and 25% (4/16), respectively (P = 0.10). When the riCa treated and control subgroups were compared for a composite index of 60 day mortality and dialysis dependency, the percentage of SCD treated subjects was 16% versus 58% in the control subjects (p

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLOS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7c604f095d796f18c4fa6a90fb0ffcbb
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132482