Back to Search Start Over

Cisplatin, epirubicin, and vindesine with or without lonidamine in the treatment of inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: A multicenter randomized clinical trial

Authors :
Vincenza Tinessa
Michele Della Vittoria Scarpati
Giuseppe De Cataldis
Alfonso Maiorino
Pasquale Comella
Giovanni P. Ianniello
Alessandra Lombardi
Luigi Brancaccio
Pietro Carnicelli
Riccardo Cioffi
Source :
Cancer. 78:63-69
Publication Year :
1996
Publisher :
Wiley, 1996.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Lonidamine (LND) is an indazol-carboxylic acid derivative that selectively inhibits the energy metabolism of neoplastic cells, and increases the permeability of cell membranes. In vitro studies have demonstrated that LND can potentiate the oncolytic activity of cytotoxic drugs and is able to reverse the acquired multidrug resistance of neoplastic cells. Some clinical trials have suggested a synergism of LND with alkylating agents, cisplatin, and anthracyclines in various solid tumors. METHODS From June 1990 to June 1993, 158 previously untreated patients with Stage IIIB and IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled into a multicentric randomized trial to evaluate the addition of LND to a cisplatin-epirubicin-vindesine regimen. Eighty patients in the control arm (A) received cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.); epirubicin, 60 mg/m2 i.v.; and vindesine, 3 mg/m2 i.v. (PEV), on Day 1 every 4 weeks, whereas 78 patients in the experimental arm (B) received the same regimen with the addition of LND from 75 mg orally three times on Day 1 to 150 mg orally three times on Day 7+ until tumor progression occurred. RESULTS The experimental treatment achieved a significantly higher proportion of major responses in comparison with the control regimen (43% vs. 24%; P = 0.02). The addition of LND apparently potentiated the activity of this cytotoxic treatment, particularly in patients with metastatic disease (overall response rate, 39% vs. 17%). The median time to progression (5 vs. 8 months; P = 0.0007) and the median survival time (7.6 vs. 11 months; P = 0.0013) were also statistically improved in Arm B. The acute toxicity of the 2 treatments was low: only 6% of patients in Arm A and 4% of patients in Arm B had to withdraw from treatment due to Grade 4 World Health Organization toxicity. The main additional side effects related to the administration of LND were epigastralgia, myalgia, asthenia, and orchialgia. However, these symptoms were mild and controlled by the concomitant administration of low doses of steroids. CONCLUSIONS The mild acute toxicity of the PEV regimen and the acceptable and nonoverlapping additional side effects of LND render our experimental therapy worthy of consideration for the management of NSCLC patients with poor performance status or low tolerance to more aggressive therapeutic approaches. Cancer 1996;78:63-9.

Details

ISSN :
10970142 and 0008543X
Volume :
78
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7ca7a5a56962e65c18546ab24ff41c55
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<63::aid-cncr11>3.0.co;2-5