Back to Search Start Over

Apremilast retention rate in clinical practice: observations from an Italian multi-center study

Authors :
Alarico Ariani
Simone Parisi
Patrizia Del Medico
Antonella Farina
Elisa Visalli
Aldo Biagio Molica Colella
Federica Lumetti
Rosalba Caccavale
Palma Scolieri
Romina Andracco
Francesco Girelli
Elena Bravi
Matteo Colina
Alessandro Volpe
Aurora Ianniello
Veronica Franchina
Ilaria Platè
Eleonora Di Donato
Giorgio Amato
Carlo Salvarani
Gianluca Lucchini
Francesco De Lucia
Francesco Molica Colella
Daniele Santilli
Giulio Ferrero
Antonio Marchetta
Eugenio Arrigoni
Flavio Mozzani
Rosario Foti
Gilda Sandri
Vincenzo Bruzzese
Marino Paroli
Enrico Fusaro
Andrea Becciolini
Source :
Clinical Rheumatology. 41:3219-3225
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022.

Abstract

There are few real-world setting studies focused on apremilast effectiveness (i.e., retention rate) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The main aim of this retrospective observational study is the assessment of apremilast 3-year retention rate in real-world PsA patients. Moreover, the secondary objective is to report the reasons of apremilast discontinuation and the factors related to treatment persistence.In fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers, all PsA consecutive patients who received apremilast were enrolled. Anamnestic data, treatment history, and PsA disease activity (DAPSA) at baseline were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox analysis computed the apremilast retention rate and treatment persistence-related risk factors. A p-value 0.05 was considered statistically significant.The 356 enrolled patients (median age 60 [interquartile range IQR 52-67] yrs; male prevalence 42.7%) median observation period was 17 [IQR 7-34] months (7218 patients-months). The apremilast retention rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 85.6%, 73.6%, and 61.8%. The main discontinuation reasons were secondary inefficacy (34% of interruptions), gastro-intestinal intolerance (24%), and primary inefficacy (19%). Age and oligo-articular phenotype were related to treatment persistence (respectively hazard ratio 0.98 IQR 0.96-0.99; p = 0.048 and 0.54 IQR 0.31-0.95; p = 0.03).Almost three-fifths of PsA patients receiving apremilast were still in treatment after 3 years. This study confirmed its effectiveness and safety profile. Apremilast appears as a good treatment choice in all oligo-articular PsA patients and in those ones burdened by relevant comorbidities. Key Points • Apremilast retention rates in this real-life cohort and trials are comparable. • The oligo-articular phenotype is associated with long-lasting treatment (i.e., 3 years). • No different or more prevalent adverse events were observed.

Details

ISSN :
14349949 and 07703198
Volume :
41
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Rheumatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7e80620056201dfc4baed02233e15fd3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06255-3