Back to Search Start Over

An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants

Authors :
Luke A. D. Miller
Masouma Mohamed
Lopa Mehta
Sean R. Moore
Suchitra K. Hourigan
Anne M. Evans
Alaa Abdelghani
Shira Levy
Elizaveta Freinkman
Sivapriya Ramamoorthy
Source :
BMC Microbiology, BMC Microbiology, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Background Stool metabolites provide essential insights into the function of the gut microbiome. The current gold standard for storage of stool samples for metabolomics is flash-freezing at − 80 °C which can be inconvenient and expensive. Ambient temperature storage of stool is more practical, however no available methodologies adequately preserve the metabolomic profile of stool. A novel sampling kit (OMNImet.GUT; DNA Genotek, Inc.) was introduced for ambient temperature storage and stabilization of feces for metabolomics; we aimed to test the performance of this kit vs. flash-freezing. To do this stool was collected from an infant’s diaper was divided into two aliquots: 1) flash-frozen and 2) stored in an OMNImet.GUT tube at ambient temperature for 3–4 days. Samples from the same infant were collected at 2 different time points to assess metabolite changes over time. Subsequently, all samples underwent metabolomic analysis by liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results Paired fecal samples (flash-frozen and ambient temperature) from 16 infants were collected at 2 time points (32 individual samples, 64 aliquots). Similar numbers of metabolites were detected in both the frozen and ambient temperature samples (1126 in frozen, 1107 in ambient temperature, 1064 shared between sample types). Metabolite abundances were strongly correlated between storage methods (median Spearman correlation Rs = 0.785 across metabolites). Hierarchical clustering analysis and principal component analysis showed that samples from the same individuals at a given time point clustered closely, regardless of the storage method. Repeat samples from the same individual were compared by paired t-test, separately for the frozen and OMNImet.GUT. The number of metabolites in each biochemical class that significantly changed (p Conclusion Ambient temperature storage and stabilization of stool in the OMNImet.GUT device yielded comparable metabolomic results to flash freezing in terms of 1) the identity and abundance of detected biochemicals 2) the distinct metabolomic profiles of subjects and 3) changes in metabolites over time that are plausibly microbiota-induced. This method potentially provides a more convenient, less expensive home collection and storage option for stool metabolomic analysis.

Details

ISSN :
14712180
Volume :
21
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Microbiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....805b40a7c679e53d8540962d819af2e1
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02104-6