Back to Search Start Over

Primary Production in the Delta: Then and Now

Authors :
Letitia Grenier
Elizabeth A. Canuel
Charles A. Simenstad
John F. DeGeorge
Judith Z. Drexler
Robert J. Naiman
Jon R. Burau
Robin M. Grossinger
Sam M. Safran
James E. Cloern
Amy Richey
Emily R. Howe
April Robinson
Anke Mueller-Solger
Katharyn E. Boyer
Ronald T. Kneib
Chris Enright
James L. Pinckney
David H. Schoellhamer
Source :
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, Vol 14, Iss 3 (2016), Cloern, James E.; Robinson, April; Richey, Amy; Grenier, Letitia; Grossinger, Robin; Boyer, Katharyn E.; et al.(2016). Primary Production in the Delta: Then and Now. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 14(3). Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8fq0n5gx
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
eScholarship Publishing, University of California, 2016.

Abstract

Author(s): Cloern, James E.; Robinson, April; Richey, Amy; Grenier, Letitia; Grossinger, Robin; Boyer, Katharyn E.; Burau, Jon; Canuel, Elizabeth A.; DeGeorge, John F.; Drexler, Judith Z.; Enright, Chris; Howe, Emily R.; Kneib, Ronald; Mueller–Solger, Anke; Naiman, Robert J.; Pinckney, James L.; Safran, Samuel M.; Schoellhamer, David; Simenstad, Charles | Abstract: To evaluate the role of restoration in the recovery of the Delta ecosystem, we need to have clear targets and performance measures that directly assess ecosystem function. Primary production is a crucial ecosystem process, which directly limits the quality and quantity of food available for secondary consumers such as invertebrates and fish. The Delta has a low rate of primary production, but it is unclear whether this was always the case. Recent analyses from the Historical Ecology Team and Delta Landscapes Project provide quantitative comparisons of the areal extent of 14 habitat types in the modern Delta versus the historical Delta (pre-1850). Here we describe an approach for using these metrics of land use change to: (1) produce the first quantitative estimates of how Delta primary production and the relative contributions from five different producer groups have been altered by large-scale drainage and conversion to agriculture; (2) convert these production estimates into a common currency so the contributions of each producer group reflect their food quality and efficiency of transfer to consumers; and (3) use simple models to discover how tidal exchange between marshes and open water influences primary production and its consumption. Application of this approach could inform Delta management in two ways. First, it would provide a quantitative estimate of how large-scale conversion to agriculture has altered the Delta's capacity to produce food for native biota. Second, it would provide restoration practitioners with a new approach—based on ecosystem function—to evaluate the success of restoration projects and gauge the trajectory of ecological recovery in the Delta region.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15462366
Volume :
14
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....81c9f9e139449edc850c75c5b8e2ed34