Back to Search Start Over

The Condorcet Efficiency Advantage that Voter Indifference Gives to Approval Voting Over Some Other Voting Rules

Authors :
Dominique Lepelley
William V. Gehrlein
University of Delaware [Newark]
Centre d'Économie et de Management de l'Océan Indien (CEMOI)
Université de La Réunion (UR)
Source :
Group Decision and Negotiation, Group Decision and Negotiation, INFORMS, 2014, 24 (2), pp.243--269. ⟨10.1007/s10726-014-9388-4⟩
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2014.

Abstract

International audience; Approval Voting is known to possess many good properties when voters have dichotomous preferences. But, when attention was restricted to the limiting case for large electorates with three candidates in an early study, Approval Voting was found to have the same Condorcet Efficiency as both Plurality Rule and Negative Plurality rule when no voter indifference is allowed in voters’ preferences with the assumption of the impartial culture condition (IC). However, a later study by Diss et al. (Handbook on approval voting, 2010) shows that the introduction of any degree of indifference in an extended impartial culture condition leads to a dominance of Approval Voting over both Plurality Rule and Negative Plurality Rule on the basis of Condorcet Efficiency. Scenarios were also found for which Approval Voting had greater Condorcet Efficiency than Borda Rule. The assumptions of that study are analyzed here, and an arguably more reasonable set of assumptions leads to the conclusion that Borda Rule will dominate Approval Voting on the basis of Condorcet Efficiency for all degrees of voter indifference, except for the case of completely dichotomous preferences. The same outcome is found to result in the current study for an extended version of the Impartial Anonymous Culture Condition.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09262644 and 15729907
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Group Decision and Negotiation, Group Decision and Negotiation, INFORMS, 2014, 24 (2), pp.243--269. ⟨10.1007/s10726-014-9388-4⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8203864acbca55ca6ab359308575dcbd
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9388-4⟩