Back to Search Start Over

Return to work experiences of patients treated with stem cell transplantation for a hematologic malignancy

Authors :
Marie-Jose Kersten
Mai J. M. Chinapaw
Saskia Persoon
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen
S. Koning
Frans Nollet
Laurien M. Buffart
Sietske J. Tamminga
Public and occupational health
Epidemiology and Data Science
APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases
CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life
Rehabilitation medicine
Hematology
APH - Quality of Care
Human genetics
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D)
APH - Methodology
APH - Societal Participation & Health
CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
AMS - Restoration & Development
Clinical Haematology
Coronel Institute of Occupational Health
Source :
Persoon, S, Buffart, L M, Chinapaw, M J M, Nollet, F, Frings-Dresen, M H, Koning, S, Kersten, M J & Tamminga, S J 2019, ' Return to work experiences of patients treated with stem cell transplantation for a hematologic malignancy ', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2987-2997 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4596-0, Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(8), 2987-2997. Springer Verlag, Supportive Care in Cancer, Supportive care in cancer, 27(8), 2987-2997. Springer Verlag
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

PURPOSE: This qualitative study aimed to identify hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors' (1) work perceptions; (2) barriers to and facilitators of return to work (RTW); and (3) possible solutions to improve RTW.METHOD: Fifteen patients treated with HSCT 1-5 years ago participated in face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed following the steps of thematic content analyses.RESULTS: RTW was often characterized as a complex and prolonged trajectory, and it was frequently incomplete in working hours, tasks, and/or responsibilities. Work perceptions varied between patients; most valued work as positive, but some also reported a decline in work capacity and/or in importance. Perceived barriers included the duration and side effects of cancer treatment, the presence of comorbidity and poor health before diagnosis, having difficulties commuting and doing household tasks. Perceived facilitators were financial incentives, keeping in touch with the workplace, support of other patients and family, and looking after one's health. Proposed solutions to improve RTW included discussing RTW at the hospital, enhanced employer support, improved accessibility of rehabilitation programs, and more information about the consequences of being sick-listed.CONCLUSIONS: Many HSCT survivors value work as important and they are motivated to RTW. Insight in work perceptions, RTW barriers, and solutions might help researchers, healthcare professionals, and employers to develop and/or tailor individualized multidisciplinary care to facilitate RTW.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09414355
Volume :
27
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Supportive care in cancer
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....82a9f65d11a2515ced49460ded735908
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4596-0