Back to Search
Start Over
Early glottic carcinoma: Treatment according patient's preference?
- Source :
- Head & Neck. 25:1051-1056
- Publication Year :
- 2003
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2003.
-
Abstract
- Background. To analyze the results in early (stage I and II) glottic carcinoma of a single institution with a patient- oriented concept. Methods. After diagnostic workup and multidisciplinary coun- seling, either radiotherapy or CO2 laser surgery was chosen with respect to the patient's preference. Results. Sixty-five patients underwent laser surgery and 75 had radiotherapy. For T1 tumors, the 5-year overall survival, dis- ease-specific survival, and initial local control rate after laser sur- gery and radiotherapy were comparable (OS, 85% vs 88%; DSS, 96% vs 93%; LCR, 86% vs 85%). In contrast, initial local control for T2 tumors was significantly more favorable after surgery (OS, 83% vs 78%; DSS, 83% vs 88%; LCR, 89% vs 67%). Larynx preservation was significantly higher after surgery in T1 tumors (96% vs 82%) and in T2 tumors (89% vs 77%). Conclusions. Selection of the treatment modality according to patient's preference results in a comparable control of disease for T1 tumors. The initial local control for T2 tumors is significantly better after surgery. In both stages laser surgery warrants a bet- ter larynx preservation rate. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 25: 1051-1056, 2003
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Laser surgery
Larynx
Glottis
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Carcinoma
Humans
Medicine
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Survival rate
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over
business.industry
Patient Selection
Retrospective cohort study
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Surgery
Survival Rate
Radiation therapy
Treatment Outcome
medicine.anatomical_structure
Otorhinolaryngology
Glottic cancer
Female
Laser Therapy
Patient Participation
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10970347 and 10433074
- Volume :
- 25
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Head & Neck
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....837cc234e2fff68d5b1553295239b128