Back to Search Start Over

Pre-vaccination type-specific HPV prevalence in confirmed cervical high grade lesions in the Māori and non-Māori populations in New Zealand

Authors :
Hazel Lewis
Karen Canfell
Harold Neal
Leonardo Simonella
Yoon-Jung Kang
Megan Smith
Collette Bromhead
Source :
BMC Infectious Diseases
Publisher :
Springer Nature

Abstract

Background New Zealand initiated HPV vaccination in 2008, and has attained 3-dose coverage of ~50 % in 12–13 year old girls. Due to the success of program initiatives in Māori girls, higher coverage rates of ~60 % have been achieved in this group. We have previously reported a benchmark overall pre-vaccination prevalence of oncogenic HPV infection in high grade cervical lesions in New Zealand. The current extended analysis provides separate pre-vaccination benchmark prevalence for Māori and non-Māori women. Methods The National Cervical Screening Programme Register (NCSP-R) was used to identify any woman aged 20–69 years of age with an index high grade cytology report from 2009–2011. Extended recruitment was performed until 2012 in clinics with a high proportion of Māori women. Ethnicity status was based on self-reported information by participating women through phone contact supplemented by recordings on the study questionnaire (the NCSP-R was not used to extract ethnicity status). A total of 730 women consented to participate and had a valid HPV test result; 418 of these had histologically-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 lesions (149 Māori, 269 non-Māori). The prevalence of any cervical oncogenic HPV infection, HPV16, and HPV18 was calculated in women with CIN2/3. Results In confirmed CIN2/3, the prevalence of any oncogenic HPV, HPV16 and HPV18 was 96 % (95 % CI:91–99 %), 54 % (95 % CI:46–63 %), 11 % (95 % CI:7–18 %) in Māori and 96 % (95 % CI:93–98 %), 54 % (95 % CI:48–60 %), 11 % (95 % CI:7–15 %) in non-Māori women, respectively. Age-specific patterns of infection for HPV16/18 in confirmed CIN2/3 differed between the two groups (Pinteraction = 0.02), with a lower prevalence in younger vs. older Māori women (57 % in 20–29 years vs 75 % in 40–69 years) but a higher prevalence in younger vs. older non-Māori women (70 % in 20–29 years vs 49 % in 40–69 years); the difference in the age-specific patterns of infection for HPV16/18 was not significant either when considering confirmed CIN2 alone (p = 0.09) or CIN3 alone (p = 0.22). Conclusions The overall prevalence of vaccine-included types in CIN2/3 was similar in Māori and non-Māori women, implying that the long-term effects of vaccination will be similar in the two groups. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1034-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712334
Volume :
15
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMC Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8433798289ffb618c22e150d728401b2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1034-5