Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of a short food questionnaire to screen for low protein intake in community-dwelling older adults: The Protein Screener 55+ (Pro55+)

Authors :
Marjolein Visser
H.C.W. de Vet
Hanneke A.H. Wijnhoven
Marieke B. Snijder
Mary Nicolaou
Liset E M Elstgeest
Public and occupational health
APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases
APH - Methodology
APH - Aging & Later Life
AGEM - Endocrinology, metabolism and nutrition
Nutrition and Health
APH - Mental Health
Source :
Wijnhoven, H A H, Elstgeest, L E M, de Vet, H C W, Nicolaou, M, Snijder, M B & Visser, M 2018, ' Development and validation of a short food questionnaire to screen for low protein intake in community-dwelling older adults : The Protein Screener 55+ (Pro 55+ ) ', PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 5, e0196406 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196406, PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 5, p e0196406 (2018), PLoS ONE, 13(5):e0196406. Public Library of Science, PLoS ONE, PLOS ONE
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2018.

Abstract

In old age, sufficient protein intake is important to preserve muscle mass and function. Around 50% of older adults (65+ y) consumes 1.0 g/kg adjusted body weight (BW)/day (d). There is no rapid method available to screen for low protein intake in old age. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a short food questionnaire to screen for low protein intake in community-dwelling older adults. We used data of 1348 older men and women (56–101 y) of the LASA study (the Netherlands) to develop the questionnaire and data of 563 older men and women (55–71 y) of the HELIUS study (the Netherlands) for external validation. In both samples, protein intake was measured by the 238-item semi-quantitative HELIUS food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to predict protein intake 1.0 g/kg adjusted BW/d (based on the HELIUS FFQ). Candidate predictor variables were FFQ questions on frequency and amount of intake of specific foods. In both samples, 30% had a protein intake 1.0 g/kg adjusted BW/d. Our final model included adjusted body weight and 10 questions on the consumption (amount on average day or frequency in 4 weeks) of: slices of bread (number); glasses of milk (number); meat with warm meal (portion size); cheese (amount and frequency); dairy products (like yoghurt) (frequency); egg(s) (frequency); pasta/noodles (frequency); fish (frequency); and nuts/peanuts (frequency). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.889 (95% CI 0.870–0.907). The calibration slope was 1.03 (optimal slope 1.00). At a cut-off of 0.8 g/kg adjusted BW/d, the AUC was 0.916 (96% CI 0.897–0.936). Applying the regression equation to the HELIUS sample, the AUC was 0.856 (95% CI 0.824–0.888) and the calibration slope 0.92. Regression coefficients were therefore subsequently shrunken by a linear factor 0.92. To conclude, the short food questionnaire (Pro55+) can be used to validly screen for protein intake 1.0 g/kg adjusted BW/d in community-dwelling older adults. An online version can be found at www.proteinscreener.nl. External validation in other countries is recommended.

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLOS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....846d259ef2840246d99a93e4fbefdf87