Back to Search
Start Over
The Early dark energy resolution to the Hubble tension in light of weak lensing surveys and lensing anomalies
- Source :
- Physical Review D, Physical Review D, American Physical Society, 2021, 103 (6), pp.063502. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063502⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Early Dark Energy (EDE) contributing a fraction $f_{\rm EDE}(z_c)\sim 10 \%$ of the energy density of the universe around $z_c\simeq 3500$ and diluting as or faster than radiation afterwards, can provide a resolution to the Hubble tension, the $\sim 5\sigma$ discrepancy between the $H_0$ value derived from early- and late-universe observations within $\Lambda$CDM. However, it has been pointed out that Large-Scale Structure (LSS) data, which are in $\sim3\sigma$ tension with $\Lambda$CDM and EDE cosmologies, might alter these conclusions. We reassess the viability of the EDE against a host of high- and low-redshift measurements, by combining LSS observations from recent weak lensing (WL) surveys with CMB, Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO), growth function (FS) and Supernova Ia (SNIa) data. Introducing a model whose only parameter is $f_{\rm EDE}(z_c)$, we report a $\sim 2\sigma$ preference for non-zero $f_{\rm EDE}(z_c)$ from Planck data alone and the tension with SH0ES is reduced below $2\sigma$. Adding BAO, FS and SNIa does not affect this result, while the inclusion of a prior on $H_0$ from SH0ES increase the preference for non-zero EDE to $\sim3.6\sigma$. After checking the EDE non-linear matter power spectrum predicted by standard semi-analytical algorithms via a set of $N$-body simulations, we show that current WL data do not rule out EDE. We also caution against the interpretation of constraints obtained from combining statistically inconsistent data sets within the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. In light of the CMB lensing anomalies, we show that the lensing-marginalized CMB data also favor non-zero $f_{\rm EDE}(z_c)$ at $\sim2\sigma$, predicts $H_0$ in $1.4\sigma$ agreement with SH0ES and $S_8$ in $1.5\sigma$ ($0.8\sigma$) agreement with KV (DES) data. Alternatively, we discuss promising extensions of the EDE cosmology that could allow to fully restore cosmological concordance.<br />Comment: 28 pages, 13 figures, 11 tables
- Subjects :
- Particle physics
cosmological model
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
satellite: Planck
statistical analysis: confidence limit
constraint
Cosmic microwave background
energy resolution
FOS: Physical sciences
anomaly
Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
cosmic background radiation
baryon: oscillation: acoustic
Lambda
01 natural sciences
Cosmology
matter: power spectrum: nonlinear
symbols.namesake
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
gravitation: lens
0103 physical sciences
energy: density
structure
010306 general physics
dark energy
Weak gravitational lensing
Physics
supernova: Type I
Hubble constant
010308 nuclear & particles physics
parametrization
resolution
tension
redshift
Redshift
Baryon
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
13. Climate action
[PHYS.HPHE]Physics [physics]/High Energy Physics - Phenomenology [hep-ph]
symbols
Dark energy
many-body problem
[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph]
Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Hubble's law
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15507998 and 15502368
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Physical Review D, Physical Review D, American Physical Society, 2021, 103 (6), pp.063502. ⟨10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063502⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8594318c31951302d8d0a04296ba51c2
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063502⟩