Back to Search Start Over

Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography

Authors :
Rami Jubeh
Stephane Fournier
Thomas McAndrew
Akiko Maehara
Mitsuaki Matsumura
Thomas Engstrøm
Ran Kornowski
Ajay J. Kirtane
Allen Jeremias
William F. Fearon
Abid Assali
Stephan Achenbach
Gabriel Greenberg
Ovidiu Dressler
Martin B. Leon
Richard Shlofmitz
Bernard De Bruyne
Daniel M. Kolansky
Source :
Circulation. 139:477-484
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2019.

Abstract

Background: Measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a pressure wire remains underutilized because of the invasiveness of guide wire placement or the need for a hyperemic stimulus. FFR derived from routine coronary angiography (FFR angio ) eliminates both of these requirements and displays FFR values of the entire coronary tree. The FFR angio Accuracy versus Standard FFR (FAST-FFR) study is a prospective, multicenter, international trial with the primary goal of determining the accuracy of FFR angio . Methods: Coronary angiography was performed in a routine fashion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. FFR was measured in vessels with coronary lesions of varying severity using a coronary pressure wire and hyperemic stimulus. Based on angiograms of the respective arteries acquired in ≥2 different projections, on-site operators blinded to FFR then calculated FFR angio using proprietary software. Coprimary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of the dichotomously scored FFR angio for predicting pressure wire–derived FFR using a cutoff value of 0.80. The study was powered to meet prespecified performance goals for sensitivity and specificity. Results: Ten centers in the United States, Europe, and Israel enrolled a total of 301 subjects and 319 vessels meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria which were included in the final analysis. The mean FFR was 0.81 and 43% of vessels had an FFR≤0.80. The per-vessel sensitivity and specificity were 94% (95% CI, 88% to 97%) and 91% (86% to 95%), respectively, both of which exceeded the prespecified performance goals. The diagnostic accuracy of FFR angio was 92% overall and remained high when only considering FFR values between 0.75 to 0.85 (87%). FFR angio values correlated well with FFR measurements ( r =0.80, P angio was 99%. Conclusions: FFR angio measured from the coronary angiogram alone has a high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared with pressure wire–derived FFR. FFR angio has the promise to substantially increase physiological coronary lesion assessment in the catheterization laboratory, thereby potentially leading to improved patient outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT03226262.

Details

ISSN :
15244539 and 00097322
Volume :
139
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Circulation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....85d245c635e68ee982808206498028d6