Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes in patients with DLBCL treated with commercial CAR T cells compared with alternate therapies

Authors :
Michael Scordo
Gunjan L. Shah
Ariela Noy
Andrew D. Zelenetz
Lorenzo Falchi
Sean M. Devlin
Erel Joffe
Gottfried von Keudell
David Sermer
Miguel-Angel Perales
Craig S. Sauter
Alison J. Moskowitz
Paul A. Hamlin
Anas Younes
Caleb Ho
Mari Lynne Silverberg
Aishat Afuye
Jessica Flynn
Audrey Hamilton
Richard J. Lin
Martina Pennisi
Philip Caron
Ildefonso Rodriguez-Rivera
Parastoo B. Dahi
Anita Kumar
M. Lia Palomba
Joachim Yahalom
Matthew J. Matasar
Colette Owens
Connie L Batlevi
Steven M. Horwitz
David J. Straus
Source :
Blood Adv
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Society of Hematology, 2020.

Abstract

The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been approved for R/R DLBCL after 2 prior lines of therapy based on data from single-arm phase 2 trials, with complete responses (CRs) in 40% to 60% of patients. However, a direct comparison with other treatments is not available and, moreover, its true efficacy in real-world patients is unknown. In this single center, retrospective, observational study of 215 patients, we compared outcomes in patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy (n = 69) with a historical population treated with alternate therapies (n = 146). Patients treated with CAR T cell vs alternate therapies demonstrated a CR rate of 52% vs 22% (P < .001), median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.2 vs 2.3 months (P = .01), and median overall survival (OS) of 19.3 vs 6.5 months (P = .006), and this advantage appeared to persist irrespective of the number of lines of prior therapy. After adjusting for unfavorable pretreatment disease characteristics, superior overall response rate in the CAR T cohort remained significant; however, differences in PFS and OS between cohorts did not. In addition, patients who responded to alternate therapies demonstrated prolonged remissions comparable to those who responded to CAR T therapy. We contend that in select clinical scenarios alternate therapies may be as efficacious as CAR T therapy; thus, additional study is warranted, ideally with randomized prospective trials.

Details

ISSN :
24739537 and 24739529
Volume :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Blood Advances
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....85e5272cfe7234d3b92d39bfefa53dce
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002118