Back to Search Start Over

Variability in chest compression rate calculations during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Authors :
Anne V. McKenzie
Candice Burns
Lisa Steele
Andrew R. Yates
Tageldin M. Ahmed
Theresa Kirkpatrick
Peter M. Mourani
Shirley Viteri
Athena F. Zuppa
J. Michael Dean
Ann Pawluszka
Deborah Franzon
Robert M. Sutton
Elyse Tomanio
Sarah Tabbutt
Richard Holubkov
Maryam Y. Naim
Ashley Siems
Mark W. Hall
Ryan W. Morgan
David A. Hehir
Christopher M. Horvat
Bradley Tilford
Robert Bishop
Myke Federman
Kylee Arbogast
Martha Sisko
Joseph A. Carcillo
Russel Telford
Stuart H. Friess
Sabrina M. Heidemann
Heather Wolfe
Anil Sapru
William P. Landis
Murray M. Pollack
Vinay M. Nadkarni
Richard P. Fernandez
Ron W Reeder
Leighann Koch
Robert A. Berg
Kathleen L. Meert
Leanna Huard
Carleen Schneiter
Arushi Manga
J. Wesley Diddle
Tanaya Deshmukh
David L. Wessel
Ericka L. Fink
Melissa Pederson
Ramany John
Todd C. Carpenter
Kathryn Graham
Tensing Maa
Tina Day
Whitney Colemam
Daniel A. Notterman
Ruth Grosskreuz
Matthew Bochkoris
Patrick S. McQuillen
Source :
Resuscitation
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

AIM: The mathematical method used to calculate chest compression (CC) rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation varies in the literature and across device manufacturers. The objective of this study was to determine the variability in calculated CC rates by applying four published methods to the same dataset. METHODS: This study was a secondary investigation of the first 200 pediatric cardiac arrest events with invasive arterial line waveform data in the ICU-RESUScitation Project (NCT02837497). Instantaneous CC rates were calculated during periods of uninterrupted CCs. The defined minimum interruption length affects rate calculation (e.g., if an interruption is defined as a break in CCs ≥ 2 seconds, the lowest possible calculated rate is 30 CCs/min). Average rates were calculated by four methods: 1) rate with an interruption defined as ≥ 1 second; 2) interruption ≥ 2 seconds; 3) interruption ≥ 3 seconds; 4) method #3 excluding top and bottom quartiles of calculated rates. American Heart Association Guideline-compliant rate was defined as 100–120 CCs/min. A clinically important change was defined as ± 5 CCs/min. The percentage of events and epochs (30 second periods) that changed Guideline-compliant status was calculated. RESULTS: Across calculation methods, mean CC rates (118.7 – 119.5/min) were similar. Comparing all methods, 14 events (7%) and 114 epochs (6%) changed Guideline-compliant status. CONCLUSION: Using four published methods for calculating CC rate, average rates were similar, but 7% of events changed Guideline-compliant status. These data suggest that a uniform calculation method (interruption ≥ 1 second) should be adopted to decrease variability in resuscitation science.

Details

ISSN :
03009572
Volume :
149
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Resuscitation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....862fbbba1ddc97dcc55f3f38f1795449
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.040