Back to Search Start Over

Applying Radiomics to Predict Pathology of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Nodal Masses in Germ Cell Tumors

Authors :
Padraig Warde
Michael A.S. Jewett
Aaron R. Hansen
Philippe L. Bedard
Paul Dufort
Armando J. Lorenzo
Abha A. Gupta
Lynn Anson Cartwright
Ricardo Leão
Robert J. Hamilton
Jeremy Lewin
Peter Chung
Jaydeep Halankar
Joan Sweet
Ur Metser
Madhur Nayan
Martin O'Malley
Jeffrey Traubici
Source :
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2018.

Abstract

Purpose After chemotherapy, approximately 50% of patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) who undergo retroperitoneal lymph node dissections (RPNLDs) for residual masses have fibrosis. Radiomics uses image processing techniques to extract quantitative textures/features from regions of interest (ROIs) to train a classifier that predicts outcomes. We hypothesized that radiomics would identify patients with a high likelihood of fibrosis who may avoid RPLND. Patients and Methods Patients with GCT who had an RPLND for nodal masses > 1 cm after first-line platinum chemotherapy were included. Preoperative contrast-enhanced axial computed tomography images of retroperitoneal ROIs were manually contoured. Radiomics features (n = 153) were used to train a radial basis function support vector machine classifier to discriminate between viable GCT/mature teratoma versus fibrosis. A nested 10-fold cross-validation protocol was used to determine classifier accuracy. Clinical variables/restricted size criteria were used to optimize the classifier. Results Seventy-seven patients with 102 ROIs were analyzed (GCT, 21; teratoma, 41; fibrosis, 40). The discriminative accuracy of radiomics to identify GCT/teratoma versus fibrosis was 72 ± 2.2% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.74 ± 0.028); sensitivity was 56.2 ± 15.0%, and specificity was 81.9 ± 9.0% ( P = .001). No major predictive differences were identified when data were restricted by varying maximal axial diameters (AUC range, 0.58 ± 0.05 to 0.74 ± 0.03). The prediction algorithm using clinical variables alone identified an AUC of 0.76. When these variables were added to the radiomics signature, the best performing classifier was identified when axial masses were limited to diameter < 2 cm (accuracy, 88.2 ± 4.4; AUC, 0.80 ± 0.05; P = .02). Conclusion A predictive radiomics algorithm had a discriminative accuracy of 72% that improved to 88% when combined with clinical predictors. Additional independent validation is required to assess whether radiomics allows patients with a high predicted likelihood of fibrosis to avoid RPLND.

Details

ISSN :
24734276
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....86348dc87be8c289d0e1480b9d01c8e8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.18.00004