Back to Search Start Over

Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants

Authors :
Kjersti Aagaard
Leslie Young
Daniele De Luca
Andrew W. Gill
Martin Kluckow
Roger Soll
Lisa M. Askie
Euan M. Wallace
John Simes
Harshad Patel
William Tarnow-Mordi
Nick Evans
Susan P. Walker
Peta M. Forder
Mohamed E Abdel-Latif
Arvind Sehgal
Lelia Duley
Margo Pritchard
Yan Chen
Adrienne Kirby
Guan Koh
Shabina Ariff
Lumaan Sheikh
David Isaacs
Val Gebski
Katie M. Groom
Michael Fogarty
Helen G. Liley
Kristy P. Robledo
Kei Lui
Walid El-Naggar
Michelle Jeffery
Graham Reynolds
Philip Weston
Rebecca Brown
Anthony C Keech
Koert de Waal
Ian M. R Wright
Himanshu Popat
Paul B. Colditz
Joanna E. Gullam
Scott Morris
Mohan Pammi
David A Osborn
Andrew Watkins
Alpana Ghadge
Lucille Sebastian
Michael A. Belfort
Jonathan M. Morris
Karen Simmer
David G. Sweet
Sarah Finlayson
John P. Newnham
Neil Marlow
Wendy Hague
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine. 377:2445-2455
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, 2017.

Abstract

Background: The preferred timing of umbilical-cord clamping in preterm infants is unclear. Methods: We randomly assigned fetuses from women who were expected to deliver before 30 weeks of gestation to either immediate clamping of the umbilical cord (≤10 seconds after delivery) or delayed clamping (≥60 seconds after delivery). The primary composite outcome was death or major morbidity (defined as severe brain injury on postnatal ultrasonography, severe retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, or late-onset sepsis) by 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, accounting for multiple births. Results: Of 1634 fetuses that underwent randomization, 1566 were born alive before 30 weeks of gestation; of these, 782 were assigned to immediate cord clamping and 784 to delayed cord clamping. The median time between delivery and cord clamping was 5 seconds and 60 seconds in the respective groups. Complete data on the primary outcome were available for 1497 infants (95.6%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome between infants assigned to delayed clamping (37.0%) and those assigned to immediate clamping (37.2%) (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.13; P=0.96). The mortality was 6.4% in the delayed-clamping group and 9.0% in the immediate-clamping group (P=0.03 in unadjusted analyses; P=0.39 after post hoc adjustment for multiple secondary outcomes). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidences of chronic lung disease or other major morbidities. Conclusions: Among preterm infants, delayed cord clamping did not result in a lower incidence of the combined outcome of death or major morbidity at 36 weeks of gestation than immediate cord clamping. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC] and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre; APTS Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12610000633088. opens in new tab.)

Details

ISSN :
15334406 and 00284793
Volume :
377
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....876bf3988e2d7f09ad728a22a97329fd