Back to Search Start Over

The utility of data-driven feature selection: Re: Chu et al. 2012

Authors :
Mark S. Cohen
Ariana Anderson
Wesley T. Kerr
Pamela K. Douglas
Source :
Kerr, WT; Douglas, PK; Anderson, A; & Cohen, MS. (2014). The utility of data-driven feature selection: Re: Chu et al. 2012. NeuroImage, 84, 1107-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.050. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/434533t6
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2014.

Abstract

The recent Chu et al. (2012) manuscript discusses two key findings regarding feature selection (FS): (1) data driven FS was no better than using whole brain voxel data and (2) a priori biological knowledge was effective to guide FS. Use of FS is highly relevant in neuroimaging-based machine learning, as the number of attributes can greatly exceed the number of exemplars.We strongly endorse their demonstration of both of these findings, andwe provide additional important practical and theoretical arguments as towhy, in their case, the data-driven FS methods they implemented did not result in improved accuracy. Further, we emphasize that the data-driven FS methods they tested performed approximately as well as the all-voxel case. We discuss why a sparse model may be favored over a complex one with similar performance. We caution readers that the findings in the Chu et al. report should not be generalized to all data-driven FS methods. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Kerr, WT; Douglas, PK; Anderson, A; & Cohen, MS. (2014). The utility of data-driven feature selection: Re: Chu et al. 2012. NeuroImage, 84, 1107-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.050. UCLA: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/434533t6
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....87c2813e303d3b011f0f95bc1e43692a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.050.