Back to Search Start Over

Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists' acceptance of blended therapy

Authors :
Baumeister, Harald
Terhorst, Yannik
Grässle, Cora
Freudenstein, Maren
Nübling, Rüdiger
Ebert, David Daniel
Clinical, Neuro- & Developmental Psychology
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 8, p e0236995 (2020), PLoS ONE, PLoS ONE, 15(8):e0236995, 1-15. Public Library of Science, Baumeister, H, Terhorst, Y, Grässle, C, Freudenstein, M, Nübling, R & Ebert, D D 2020, ' Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists' acceptance of blended therapy ', PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 8, e0236995, pp. 1-15 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236995
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2020.

Abstract

Blended therapy is a new approach combining advantages of face-to-face psychotherapy and Internet- and mobile-based interventions. Acceptance is a fundamental precondition for its implementation. The aim of this study was to assess 1) the acceptance of psychotherapists towards blended therapy, 2) the effectiveness of an acceptance facilitating intervention (AFI) on psychotherapists’ acceptance towards blended therapy and 3) to identify potential effect moderators. Psychotherapists (N = 284) were randomly assigned to a control (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG received a short video showing an example of blended therapy, the CG an attention placebo video. Both groups received a reliable online questionnaire assessing acceptance, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence and internet anxiety. Between group differences were examined using t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests. Exploratory analysis was conducted to identify moderators. Psychotherapists in CG showed mixed baseline acceptance towards blended therapy (low = 40%, moderate = 33%, high = 27%). IG showed significantly higher acceptance compared to CG (d = .27, pone-sided = .029; low = 24%, moderate = 47%, high = 30%). Bootstrapped confidence intervals were overlapping. Performance expectancy (d = .35), effort expectancy (d = .44) and facilitating conditions (d = .28) were significantly increased (p < .05). No effects on social influence and internet anxiety were found (p>.05). Exploratory analysis indicated psychodynamic oriented psychotherapists profiting particularly from the AFI. Blended therapy is a promising approach to improve healthcare. Psychotherapists show mixed acceptance, which might be improvable by AFIs, particularly in subpopulations of initially rather skeptical psychotherapists. Forthcoming studies should extend the present study by shifting focus from attitudes to the impact of different forms of AFIs on uptake.<br />publishedVersion

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
15
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....87dad956e9aba850747954b39cae4fcb