Comparison of microsurgery and endovascular treatment on clinical outcome following poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage

Poor-grade (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons [WFNS] clinical grading scale grades IV and V) subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the correlation between the timing, modality of intervention (clipping or coiling) and the clinical outcome is not clear. This study aims to examine this correlation. Patients presenting with WFNS grades IV and V aneurysmal SAH between 1997 and 2008 to a single centre were studied. An aggressive policy of early intervention was followed, and the selection of endovascular versus microsurgical intervention was made according to angiographic rather than clinical features. Clinical outcomes were graded using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 6 month follow-up. One hundred and forty-three poor-grade patients (23.9% of all 598 aneurysmal SAH patients) were studied. Treatment was microsurgical in 83 (58.0%) and endovascular in 60 (42%) patients. Twenty patients (14.0%) were lost to follow-up. Good outcome (mRS 0-2) at 6 months was found in 45 microsurgical patients (63.3%) and 24 endovascular patients (46.1%). This trend towards better clinical outcomes in the microsurgical group was not statistically significant. With an aggressive early treatment policy more than half of the poor-grade SAH patients demonstrated a good clinical outcome. Microsurgery and endovascular treatment, when selected primarily according to angiographic features, were equally likely to achieve good outcome.