Back to Search Start Over

Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study

Authors :
Hyo-Joon Yang
Young-Eun Joo
Min Seob Kwak
Dong Il Park
Jeong-Sik Byeon
Jongha Park
Jae Myung Cha
Jun Lee
Hyun Gun Kim
Kyeong Ok Kim
Jeong Eun Shin
Source :
Gut and Liver
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
The Editorial Office of Gut and Liver, 2019.

Abstract

Background/Aims: The use of a low-volume bowel cleansing agent is associated with a greater willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopy. Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is a recently approved low-volume agent; however, its efficacy and safety in the elderly population remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the OSS preparation, in comparison to those of a standard polyethylene glycol (PEG; 4 L) preparation, in elderly patients. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study was conducted. Participants were randomized to receive OSS or 4-L PEG with a split-dose regimen. Bowel cleansing efficacy was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Acceptance, satisfaction, and preparation-related symptoms were recorded. Additionally, blood parameters were analyzed for electrolyte abnormalities and nephrotoxicity. Results: A total of 193 patients were analyzed. No group differences in overall bowel cleansing efficacy were observed, with “adequate” preparations achieved in 95.9% (93/97) and 94.8% (91/96) of patients in the OSS and 4L PEG groups, respectively (p=0.747). However, mean BBPS scores for the entire (p=0.010) and right colon (p=0.001) were significantly higher in the OSS group than in the 4-L PEG group. The severity of clinical adverse events and frequency of acute kidney injury were similarly low, and no clinically meaningful electrolyte changes were identified. Self-reported scores regarding amount (p

Details

ISSN :
20051212 and 19762283
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gut and Liver
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8823f7761f1ff6db6538fff9252611df
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18214