Back to Search Start Over

Interactions among cluster-root investment, leaf phosphorus concentration, and relative growth rate in two Lupinus species

Authors :
Erik J. Veneklaas
Stuart J. Pearse
Hans Lambers
Xing Wang
Source :
American Journal of Botany. 102:1529-1537
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Wiley, 2015.

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY Cluster-root (CR) formation is a desirable trait to improve phosphorus (P) acquisition as global P resources are dwindling. CRs in some lupine species are suppressed at higher P status. Whether increased growth rate enhances CR formation due to a "dilution" of leaf P concentration is unknown. We investigated interactive effects of leaf P status and relative growth rate (RGR) on CR formation in two Lupinus species, which differ in their CR biomass investment. Variation in RGR was imposed by varying day length. METHODS Lupinus albus and L. pilosus were grown hydroponically with KH2PO4 at a day length of 6, 10, or 14 h. We used a slightly higher P supply at longer day lengths to avoid a decline in leaf P concentration, which would induce CRs. Cluster-root percentage, leaf P concentrations, and RGR were determined at 22, 38, and 52 d after sowing. KEY RESULTS Lupinus species grown at similar root P availability, but with a faster growth rate, as dependent on day length, showed a greater CR percentage. Because our aim to achieve exactly the same leaf P concentrations at different day lengths was only partially achieved, we carried out a multiple regression analysis. This analysis showed the CR percentage was strongly and negatively correlated with plant P status and only marginally and positively correlated with RGR. CONCLUSIONS The two Lupinus species invariably formed fewer cluster roots at higher leaf P status, irrespective of RGR. Differences in RGR or leaf P concentration cannot explain the species-specific variation in cluster-root investment.

Details

ISSN :
00029122
Volume :
102
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Botany
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8842a272cbfd7c4d84742940e2772969
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500268