Back to Search Start Over

Benefit of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Authors :
Luis Rodríguez-Padial
Mercè Roqué
Irene R. Dégano
Pedro Morrondo Valdeolmillos
Berta Vega-Hernandez
David Garcia-Dorado
Iñaki Lekuona
Pedro L. Sánchez
Rosa-Maria Lidón
Antonio Mayorga
Silvia Pérez-Fernández
Joan Vila
Alberto Núñez
Jaume Marrugat
José A. Barrabés
Daniel Bosch-Portell
Antonio Sanchez-Hidalgo
Julio Martí-Almor
Francisco Fernández-Avilés
Andres Carrillo-Lopez
Manuel F. Jiménez-Navarro
Daniel Fernández-Bergés
Marcos Rodríguez Esteban
Roberto Elosua
Laura Quintas
Javier Alameda Serrano
Emad Abu Assi
Reyes Gonzalez Fernandez
Jose Manuel Garcia Ruiz
Luis Martínez Dolz
Ane Elorriaga
Alessandro Sionis
Jessica Vaquero
Antoni Bayes-Genis
Esther Sanchez-Insa
Catalina Rubert
Vicente Bertomeu-González
Isaac Subirana
Alberto Zamora
Luis Ruiz-Valdepeñas
Juan Sanchis
Source :
Zaguán: Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza, Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Zaguán. Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Zaragoza, instname, Open Heart
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
BMJ, 2020.

Abstract

Objective Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) has demonstrated its efficacy in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, patients with STEMI >= 75 years receive less P-PCI than younger patients despite their higher in-hospital morbimortality. The objective of this analysis was to determine the effectiveness of P-PCI in patients with STEMI >= 75 years. Methods We included 979 patients with STEMI >= 75 years, from the ATencion HOspitalaria del Sindrome coronario study, a registry of 8142 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted at 31 Spanish hospitals in 2014-2016. We calculated a propensity score (PS) for the indication of P-PCI. Patients that received or not P-PCI were matched by PS. Using logistic regression, we compared the effectiveness of performing P-PCI versus non-performance for the composite primary event, which included death, reinfarction, acute pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock during hospitalisation. Results Of the included patients, 81.5 % received P-PCI. The matching provided two groups of 169 patients with and without P-PCI. Compared with its non-performance, P-PCI presented a composite event OR adjusted by PS of 0.55 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.89). Conclusions Receiving a P-PCI was significantly associated with a reduced risk of major intrahospital complications in patients with STEMI aged 75 years or older.<br />Supported by: MARATO TV3 (081630), de AGAUR (2014SGR240); del Instituto de Salud Carlos III: Red de Investigacion Cardiovascular RD12/0042 (Programa HERACLES); Red RedIAPP RD06/0018; CP12/03287; CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica; CIBERCV de enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) (European Regional Development Funds - ERDF-); FIS CP12/03287, FIS 14/00449, FIS PI081327, FIS INTRASALUD PI1101801.

Details

ISSN :
20533624
Volume :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Open Heart
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....89eb53e80de3d4443c33d5158a3647d6
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001169