Back to Search Start Over

A Comprehensive Assessment of Somatic Mutation Calling in Cancer Genomes

Authors :
Marc Dabad
John Douglas Mcpherson
Xose S. Puente
Liu Xi
Ivo Gut
Anne-Marie Patch
Semin Lee
Cyriac Kandoth
Ruben M. Drews
Charlotte Anderson
Eivind Hovig
Paul C. Boutros
Peter J. Campbell
Louis Letourneau
Paolo Ribeca
Hidewaki Nakagawa
Natalie Jäger
Daniel Vodak
Thomas J. Hudson
Anne Sophie Sertier
Pablo H. Hennings-Yeomans
John Zhang
Philip Ginsbach
Laurie Tonon
Emanuele Raineri
Sahil Seth
Sophia Derdak
Benedikt Brors
David T. W. Jones
Minghui He
Sergi Beltran
Rafael Valdés-Mas
David Torrents
Singer Ma
Myron Peto
Nagarajan Paramasivam
Matthew D. Eldridge
Robert E. Denroche
Paul T. Spellman
Francesc Castro Giner
Roland Eils
Timothy Beck
Sigve Nakken
Daniela S. Gerhard
Lawrence E. Heisler
Jared T. Simpson
Víctor Quesada
Rolf Kabbe
Andy G. Lynch
Patrick S. Tarpey
Lawrence Bower
Akihiro Fujimoto
Barbara Hutter
Matthias Schlesner
Marta Gut
Ivo Buchhalter
David A. Wheeler
Takafumi N. Yamaguchi
Simon Heath
Nicholas J. Harding
Tyler Alioto
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2014.

Abstract

The emergence of next generation DNA sequencing technology is enabling high-resolution cancer genome analysis. Large-scale projects like the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) are systematically scanning cancer genomes to identify recurrent somatic mutations. Second generation DNA sequencing, however, is still an evolving technology and procedures, both experimental and analytical, are constantly changing. Thus the research community is still defining a set of best practices for cancer genome data analysis, with no single protocol emerging to fulfil this role. Here we describe an extensive benchmark exercise to identify and resolve issues of somatic mutation calling. Whole genome sequence datasets comprising tumor-normal pairs from two different types of cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and medulloblastoma, were shared within the ICGC and submissions of somatic mutation calls were compared to verified mutations and to each other. Varying strategies to call mutations, incomplete awareness of sources of artefacts, and even lack of agreement on what constitutes an artefact or real mutation manifested in widely varying mutation call rates and somewhat low concordance among submissions. We conclude that somatic mutation calling remains an unsolved problem. However, we have identified many issues that are easy to remedy that are presented here. Our study highlights critical issues that need to be addressed before this valuable technology can be routinely used to inform clinical decision-making.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8be0553b35fcc131ab256838132ea3c7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/012997