Back to Search Start Over

Ecosystem engineers drive differing microbial community composition in intertidal estuarine sediments

Authors :
Irene Fortune
Adam J. Wyness
David M. Paterson
Matthew T. G. Holden
Morgan Hartley
Andrew J. Blight
Patricia Browne
University of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Institute
University of St Andrews. School of Biology
University of St Andrews. Sediment Ecology Research Group
University of St Andrews. Infection Group
University of St Andrews. School of Medicine
University of St Andrews. Biomedical Sciences Research Complex
University of St Andrews. Infection and Global Health Division
University of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Institute
University of St Andrews. Coastal Resources Management Group
University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland
University of St Andrews. St Andrews Bioinformatics Unit
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 2, p e0240952 (2021), PLoS ONE
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2021.

Abstract

Funding: This work was funded by the John Templeton Foundation Grant 60501, “Putting the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis to the Test”. It also received funding from the MASTS pooling initiative (The Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland, (https://www.masts.ac.uk)) and their support is gratefully acknowledged. MASTS is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant reference HR09011) and contributing institutions. DMP received funding from MASTS, funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant reference HR09011), and AJW received funding under the MASTS small grant scheme (grant reference SG433). Intertidal systems are complex and dynamic environments with many interacting factors influencing biochemical characteristics and microbial communities. One key factor are the actions of resident fauna, many of which are regarded as ecosystem engineers because of their bioturbation, bioirrigation and sediment stabilising activities. The purpose of this investigation was to elucidate the evolutionary implications of the ecosystem engineering process by identifying, if any, aspects that act as selection pressures upon microbial communities. A mesocosm study was performed using the well characterised intertidal ecosystem engineers Corophium volutator, Hediste diversicolor, and microphytobenthos, in addition to manual turbation of sediments to compare effects of bioturbation, bioirrigation and stabilisation. A range of sediment functions and biogeochemical gradients were measured in conjunction with 16S rRNA sequencing and diatom taxonomy, with downstream bacterial metagenome function prediction, to identify selection pressures that incited change to microbial community composition and function. Bacterial communities were predominantly Proteobacteria, with the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Alphaproteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia being partially displaced by Deltaproteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi as dissolved oxygen concentration and redox potential decreased. Bacterial community composition was driven strongly by biogeochemistry; surface communities were affected by a combination of sediment functions and overlying water turbidity, and subsurface communities by biogeochemical gradients driven by sediment reworking. Diatom communities were dominated by Nitzschia laevis and Achnanthes sp., and assemblage composition was influenced by overlying water turbidity (manual or biogenic) rather than direct infaunal influences such as grazing. Publisher PDF

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLOS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8c1039604584faa362da7c59787e6207
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240952