Back to Search
Start Over
The Use of Antithrombotics Is Not Beneficial for Conservative Management of Spontaneous Isolated Dissection of the Superior Mesenteric Artery: A Meta-analysis
- Source :
- Annals of Vascular Surgery. 60:415-423.e4
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Background Conservative treatment is feasible in most patients with spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SID-SMA). However, the role of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants is not well defined in either symptomatic or asymptomatic SID-SMA. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis, including a single-arm study, comparing the resolution rate of conservative management with versus without antithrombotics for symptomatic and asymptomatic SID-SMA. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, on August 22nd, 2018, was performed to identify studies concerning SID-SMA. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the primary resolution rate, long-term aneurysmal change for symptomatic SID-SMA, and any event for asymptomatic SID-SMA. We calculated pooled risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects model in studies with two arms and in studies with two arms or a single arm. Results We included data from 35 articles involving 727 patients with SID-SMA (symptomatic 693, asymptomatic 134). No significant differences were observed in the successful resolution rate between conservative management with and without antithrombotics (random-effects model, risk ratio [RR] 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87–1.05]). The pooled resolution rate from combining single-arm studies was 91% (95% CI, 85–95) and 95% (95% CI, 88–100) in conservative management with and without antithrombotic, respectively, which was not statistically significant (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91–1.02). The pooled morphologic progression rate from combining single-arm studies was 3% (95% CI, 0–8) and 11% (95% CI, 2–26) in conservative management with and without antithrombotics, respectively, which was not statistically significant (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.12–1.64). The adverse event was 0% for both groups for asymptomatic SID-SMA. Conclusions Additional antithrombotic therapy for both symptomatic and asymptomatic SID-SMA did not benefit the outcomes. We do not recommend the use of antithrombotics for SID-SMA, unless further evidence shows any beneficial effect.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Cochrane Library
Conservative Treatment
Asymptomatic
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Fibrinolytic Agents
Mesenteric Artery, Superior
Risk Factors
Internal medicine
medicine.artery
Antithrombotic
Humans
Medicine
Superior mesenteric artery
Adverse effect
Aged
business.industry
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Confidence interval
Aortic Dissection
Treatment Outcome
Relative risk
Meta-analysis
Female
Surgery
medicine.symptom
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 08905096
- Volume :
- 60
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Annals of Vascular Surgery
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8c806ff9f38e502db16598ffa9f667c1
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.022