Back to Search Start Over

Improving medication safety in the Intensive Care by identifying relevant drug-drug interactions - Results of a multicenter Delphi study

Authors :
Tinka Bakker
Joanna E. Klopotowska
Nicolette F. de Keizer
Rob van Marum
Heleen van der Sijs
Dylan W. de Lange
Evert de Jonge
Ameen Abu-Hanna
Dave A. Dongelmans
S. Hendriks
J. ten Cate
D. van Balen
M. Duyvendak
A. Karakus
M. Sigtermans
E.M. Kuck
N.G.M. Hunfeld
P.E. Spronk
H.J.M. van Kan
M.S. van der Steen
B.E. Bosma
I. Purmer
H. Kieft
A. Beishuizen
K. Movig
J.W. Vermeijden
F. Mulder
R.J. Bosman
E.J.F. Franssen
E.J. Wils
P.W. de Feiter
W.M. van den Bergh
W. Bult
M. Hoeksema
E. Wesselink
Pharmacy
Graduate School
APH - Aging & Later Life
APH - Methodology
APH - Quality of Care
Medical Informatics
Intensive Care Medicine
APH - Digital Health
Critical care, Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Emergency medicine (CAPE)
General practice
Source :
Journal of Critical Care, 57, 134. Elsevier BV, Journal of Critical Care, 57, 134-140. Elsevier, Journal of critical care, 57, 134-140. Elsevier BV, Bakker, T, Klopotowska, J E, de Keizer, N F, van Marum, R, van der Sijs, H, de Lange, D W, de Jonge, E, Abu-Hanna, A & Dongelmans, D A 2020, ' Improving medication safety in the Intensive Care by identifying relevant drug-drug interactions-Results of a multicenter Delphi study ', Journal of Critical Care, vol. 57, pp. 134-140 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.02.012, Journal of Critical Care, 57, 134-140. W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC, Journal of Critical Care, 57, 134-140. Elsevier BV
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may cause adverse outcomes in patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) may help prevent DDIs by timely showing relevant warning alerts, but knowledge on which DDIs are clinically relevant in the ICU setting is limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify DDIs relevant for the ICU. Materials and methods: We conducted a modified Delphi procedure with a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel consisting of intensivists and hospital pharmacists to assess the clinical relevance of DDIs for the ICU. The procedure consisted of two rounds, each included a questionnaire followed by a live consensus meeting. Results: In total the clinical relevance of 148 DDIs was assessed, of which agreement regarding the relevance was reached for 139 DDIs (94%). Of these 139 DDIs, 53 (38%) were considered not clinically relevant for the ICU setting. Conclusions: A list of clinically relevant DDIs for the ICU setting was established on a national level. The clinical value of CDSSs for medication safety could be improved by focusing on the identified clinically relevant DDIs, thereby avoiding alert fatigue. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Details

ISSN :
15578615 and 08839441
Volume :
57
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of critical care
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8e20958a54ac117de80ac363386461c3