Back to Search Start Over

ELN2017 risk stratification improves outcome prediction when applied to the prospective GIMEMA AML1310 protocol

Authors :
Luca Maurillo
Adriano Venditti
Maria Teresa Voso
Paolo de Fabritiis
Giovanni Martinelli
Marco Vignetti
Gabriella Storti
Mario Luppi
Francesco Buccisano
Francesco Lanza
Valentina Arena
Giovangiacinto Paterno
Lorella Melillo
Prassede Salutari
Roberto Cairoli
Serena Lavorgna
Paola Fazi
Anna Candoni
Tiziana Ottone
Alfonso Piciocchi
Maria Antonietta Irno Consalvo
Saveria Capria
Raffaele Palmieri
Maria Ilaria Del Principe
William Arcese
Valeria Calafiore
Buccisano, F
Palmieri, R
Piciocchi, A
Arena, V
Candoni, A
Melillo, L
Calafiore, V
Cairoli, R
de Fabritiis, P
Storti, G
Salutari, P
Lanza, F
Martinelli, G
Luppi, M
Capria, S
Maurillo, L
Del Principe, M
Paterno, G
Consalvo, M
Ottone, T
Lavorgna, S
Voso, M
Fazi, P
Vignetti, M
Arcese, W
Venditti, A
Buccisano, Francesco
Palmieri, Raffaele
Piciocchi, Alfonso
Arena, Valentina
Candoni, Anna
Melillo, Lorella
Calafiore, Valeria
Cairoli, Roberto
de Fabritiis, Paolo
Storti, Gabriella
Salutari, Prassede
Lanza, Francesco
Martinelli, Giovanni
Luppi, Mario
Capria, Saveria
Maurillo, Luca
Del Principe, Maria Ilaria
Paterno, Giovangiacinto
Irno Consalvo, Maria Antonietta
Ottone, Tiziana
Lavorgna, Serena
Voso, Maria Teresa
Fazi, Paola
Vignetti, Marco
Arcese, William
Venditti, Adriano
Source :
Blood advances. 6(8)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The 2017 version of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations, by integrating cytogenetics and mutational status of specific genes, divides patients with acute myeloid leukemia into 3 prognostically distinct risk categories: favorable (ELN2017-FR), intermediate (ELN2017-IR), and adverse (ELN2017-AR). We performed a post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell’Adulto) AML1310 trial to investigate the applicability of the ELN2017 risk stratification to our study population. In this trial, after induction and consolidation, patients in complete remission were to receive an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) if categorized as favorable risk or an allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) if adverse risk. Intermediate-risk patients were to receive auto-SCT or allo-SCT based on the postconsolidation levels of measurable residual disease as measured by using flow cytometry. Risk categorization was originally conducted according to the 2009 National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. Among 500 patients, 445 (89%) were reclassified according to the ELN2017 criteria: ELN2017-FR, 186 (41.8%) of 455; ELN2017-IR, 179 (40.2%) of 445; and ELN2017-AR, 80 (18%) of 455. In 55 patients (11%), ELN2017 was not applicable. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 68.8%, 51.3%, 45.8%, and 42.8% for the ELN2017-FR, ELN2017-IR, ELN2017-not classifiable, and ELN2017-AR groups, respectively (P < .001). When comparing the 2 different transplant strategies in each ELN2017 risk category, a significant benefit of auto-SCT over allo-SCT was observed among ELN2017-FR patients (2-year OS of 83.3% vs 66.7%; P = .0421). The 2 transplant procedures performed almost equally in the ELN2017-IR group (2-year OS of 73.9% vs 70.8%; P = .5552). This post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 trial confirms that the ELN2017 classification is able to accurately discriminate patients with different outcomes and who may benefit from different transplant strategies. This trial was registered as EudraCT number 2010-023809-36 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01452646.

Details

ISSN :
24739537
Volume :
6
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Blood advances
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8e3754aea28145e7ddf92fd21a7acdcc