Back to Search Start Over

The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy severe enough to cause a loss of protective sensation in a population‐based sample of people with known and newly detected diabetes in Barbados: a cross‐sectional study

Authors :
Nigel Unwin
J. R. Herbert
Oswald Peter Adams
Christina Howitt
Adams, OP [0000-0002-6707-6769]
Herbert, JR [0000-0002-1827-8612]
Unwin, N [0000-0002-1368-1648]
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
Source :
Diabetic Medicine
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Wiley, 2019.

Abstract

Aims To determine the prevalence and potential risk factors for diabetic peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation in Barbados. Methods A representative population sample aged > 25 years with previously diagnosed diabetes or a fasting blood glucose ≥ 7 mmol/l or HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) was tested by 10 g monofilament at four plantar sites per foot and a 28 Hz tuning fork and neurothesiometer at the hallux. Data were adjusted to the age structure of people with diabetes in Barbados. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations with peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation. Results Of 236 participants [74% response rate, 33% men, 91% black, median age 58.6 years, mean BMI 30.1 kg/m2, mean HbA1c 54 mmol/mol (7.1%)], 51% had previously diagnosed diabetes. Foot examination demonstrated that 25.8% (95% CI 20.2 to 31.5) had at least one insensate site with monofilament testing, 14.8% (95% CI 10.2 to 19.4) had an abnormal tuning fork test and 10.9% (95% CI 6.9 to 14.9) had a vibration perception threshold > 25 V. Peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation prevalence was 28.5% (95% CI 22.7 to 34.4) as indicated by monofilament with ≥ 1 insensate site and/or vibration perception threshold > 25 V. With previously diagnosed diabetes the prevalence was 36.4% (95% CI 27.7 to 45.2) with 98.4% of cases identified by monofilament testing. Increasing age, previously diagnosed diabetes, male sex and abdominal obesity were independently associated with peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation. Conclusions Over a third of people with previously diagnosed diabetes had evidence of peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation. Monofilament testing alone may be adequate to rule out peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation. Monofilament and neurothesiometer stimuli are reproducible but dependent on participant response.<br />What's new? In Barbados, foot problems account for 89% of diabetes‐related hospital admissions, but in primary care only 41% had a foot examination over a 2‐year period. Peripheral neuropathy prevalence in a predominantly African descent Caribbean population with diabetes is unknown.In people with known and newly diagnosed diabetes, the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation was 28.5% (95% CI 22.7 to 34.4) as indicated by monofilament testing with ≥ 1 insensate site and/or vibration perception threshold > 25 V. Monofilament testing alone identified 98% of such cases in people with previously diagnosed diabetes.Monofilament testing alone may be adequate for screening for peripheral neuropathy with a loss of protective sensation.

Details

ISSN :
14645491 and 07423071
Volume :
36
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Diabetic Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8e61d2dccd16c5ec6d3aae8edf0b700b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13989