Back to Search Start Over

Scan-based competing death risk model for re-evaluating lung cancer computed tomography screening eligibility

Authors :
Ivana Išgum
Pim A. de Jong
Ugo Pastorino
Bram van Ginneken
Mathias Prokop
Nikolas Lessmann
Michel M van den Heuvel
Anton Schreuder
Cornelia M. Schaefer-Prokop
Nicola Sverzellati
Mireille J. M. Broeders
Colin Jacobs
Mario Silva
IvI Research (FNWI)
Publica
Biomedical Engineering and Physics
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes
Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging
ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias
Source :
European Respiratory Journal, 59, 5, The European Respiratory Journal, 59(5):2101613. European Respiratory Society, European Respiratory Journal, 59, European respiratory journal, 59(5). European Respiratory Society
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

BackgroundA baseline computed tomography (CT) scan for lung cancer (LC) screening may reveal information indicating that certain LC screening participants can be screened less, and instead require dedicated early cardiac and respiratory clinical input. We aimed to develop and validate competing death (CD) risk models using CT information to identify participants with a low LC risk and a high CD risk.MethodsParticipant demographics and quantitative CT measures of LC, cardiovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were considered for deriving a logistic regression model for predicting 5-year CD risk using a sample from the National Lung Screening Trial (n=15 000). Multicentric Italian Lung Detection data were used to perform external validation (n=2287).ResultsOur final CD model outperformed an external pre-scan model (CD Risk Assessment Tool) in both the derivation (area under the curve (AUC) 0.744 (95% CI 0.727–0.761) and 0.677 (95% CI 0.658–0.695), respectively) and validation cohorts (AUC 0.744 (95% CI 0.652–0.835) and 0.725 (95% CI 0.633–0.816), respectively). By also taking LC incidence risk into consideration, we suggested a risk threshold where a subgroup (6258/23 096 (27%)) was identified with a number needed to screen to detect one LC of 216 (versus 23 in the remainder of the cohort) and ratio of 5.41 CDs per LC case (versus 0.88). The respective values in the validation cohort subgroup (774/2287 (34%)) were 129 (versus 29) and 1.67 (versus 0.43).ConclusionsEvaluating both LC and CD risks post-scan may improve the efficiency of LC screening and facilitate the initiation of multidisciplinary trajectories among certain participants.

Details

ISSN :
09031936
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Respiratory Journal, 59, 5, The European Respiratory Journal, 59(5):2101613. European Respiratory Society, European Respiratory Journal, 59, European respiratory journal, 59(5). European Respiratory Society
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8f5e719d9c1a4e17d077ade506a3e03f