Back to Search
Start Over
Influence of response instructions and response format on applicant perceptions of a Situational Judgement Test for medical school selection
- Source :
- BMC Medical Education, 18(1):282. BioMed Central Ltd., BMC Medical Education, BMC Medical Education, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2018)
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- BioMed Central Ltd., 2018.
-
Abstract
- Background This study examined the influence of two Situational Judgement Test (SJT) design features (response instructions and response format) on applicant perceptions. Additionally, we investigated demographic subgroup differences in applicant perceptions of an SJT. Methods Medical school applicants (N = 372) responded to an online survey on applicant perceptions, including a description and two example items of an SJT. Respondents randomly received one of four SJT versions (should do-rating, should do-pick-one, would do-rating, would do-pick-one). They rated overall favourability and items on four procedural justice factors (face validity, applicant differentiation, study relatedness and chance to perform) and ease-of-cheating. Additionally, applicant perceptions were compared for subgroups based on gender, ethnic background and first-generation university status. Results Applicants rated would-do instructions as easier to cheat than should-do instructions. Rating formats received more favourable judgements than pick-one formats on applicant differentiation, study-relatedness, chance to perform and ease of cheating. No significant main effect for demographic subgroup on applicant perceptions was found, but significant interaction effects showed that certain subgroups might have more pronounced preferences for certain SJT design features. Specifically, ethnic minority applicants – but not ethnic majority applicants – showed greater preference for should-do than would-do instructions. Additionally, first-generation university students – but not non-first-generation university students – were more favourable of rating formats than of pick-one formats. Conclusions Findings indicate that changing SJT design features may positively affect applicant perceptions by promoting procedural justice factors and reducing perceived ease of cheating and that response instructions and response format can increase the attractiveness of SJTs for minority applicants. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1390-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Subjects :
- Attractiveness
Male
020205 medical informatics
Psychometrics
Cheating
Applied psychology
Ethnic group
lcsh:Medicine
Situational judgement test
02 engineering and technology
Procedural justice
Affect (psychology)
Education
Young Adult
Applicant perceptions
0502 economics and business
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Humans
School Admission Criteria
Response instructions
Schools, Medical
Medical school selection
Face validity
Medical education
lcsh:LC8-6691
Analysis of Variance
lcsh:Special aspects of education
05 social sciences
lcsh:R
Reproducibility of Results
General Medicine
Response format
Preference
Aptitude Tests
Female
Educational Measurement
Psychology
050203 business & management
Research Article
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14726920
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC Medical Education
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....8fae5e38e2a6693c278d52583bfa140d