Back to Search Start Over

Optimization of Free Phytoprostane and Phytofuran Production by Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Pea Extracts Using Esterases

Authors :
Jean-Marie Galano
Raúl Domínguez-Perles
M. Rodríguez-Hernández
Angel Gil-Izquierdo
Thierry Durand
Camille Oger
Federico Ferreres
Iván López-González
Alexandre Guy
I. Sánchez-Martínez
Universidad de Murcia
Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron [Pôle Chimie Balard] (IBMM)
Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, American Chemical Society, 2020, 68 (11), pp.3445-3455. ⟨10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06624⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; Given the growing interest in phytoprostanes (PhytoPs) and phytofurans (PhytoFs) in the fields of plant physiology, biotechnology, and biological function, the present study aims to optimize a method of enzymatic hydrolysis that utilizes bacterial and yeast esterases that allow the appropriate quantification of PhytoPs and PhytoFs. To obtain the highest concentration of PhytoPs and PhytoFs, a response surface methodology/Box−Behnken design was used to optimize the hydrolysis conditions. Based on the information available in the literature on the most critical parameters that influence the activity of esterases, the three variables selected for the study were temperature (°C), time (min), and enzyme concentration (%). The optimal hydrolysis conditions retrieved differed between PhytoPs (21.5°C, 5.7 min, and 0.61 μg of enzyme per reaction) and PhytoFs (20.0°C, 5.0 min, and 2.17 μg of enzyme per reaction) and provided up to 25.1-and 1.7-fold higher contents relative to nonhydrolyzed extracts. The models were validated by comparing theoretical and experimental values for PhytoP and PhytoF yields (1.01 and 1.06 theoretical/experimental rates, respectively). The optimal conditions were evaluated for their relative influence on the yield of individual nonesterified PhytoPs and PhytoFs to define the limitations of the models for obtaining the highest concentration of most considered compounds. In conclusion, the models developed provided valuable alternatives to the currently applied methods using unspecific alkaline hydrolysis to obtain free nonesterified PhytoPs and PhytoFs, which give rise to more specific hydrolysis of PhytoP and PhytoF esters, reducing the degradation of free compounds by classical chemical procedures.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00218561 and 15205118
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, American Chemical Society, 2020, 68 (11), pp.3445-3455. ⟨10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06624⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....8fd8a70581a5d7818fe3994d5dac9173