Back to Search Start Over

Development and Internal Validation of a Discrete Event Simulation Model of Diabetic Kidney Disease Using CREDENCE Trial Data

Authors :
Michael Willis
April Slee
Cheryl Neslusan
Andreas Nilsson
Christian Asseburg
Source :
Diabetes Therapy
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Introduction The Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) study showed that compared with placebo, canagliflozin 100 mg significantly reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events and adverse renal outcomes in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We developed a simulation model that can be used to estimate the long-term health and economic consequences of DKD treatment interventions for patients matching the CREDENCE study population. Methods The CREDENCE Economic Model of DKD (CREDEM-DKD) was developed using patient-level data from CREDENCE (which recruited patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate 30 to 300–5000 mg/g, and taking the maximum tolerated dose of a renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor). Risk prediction equations were fit for start of maintenance dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine, hospitalization for heart failure, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and all-cause mortality. A micro-simulation model was constructed using these risk equations combined with user-definable kidney transplant event risks. Internal validation was performed by loading the model to replicate the CREDENCE study and comparing predictions with trial Kaplan–Meier estimate curves. External validation was performed by loading the model to replicate a subgroup of the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program with patient characteristics that would have qualified for inclusion in CREDENCE. Results Risk prediction equations generally fit well and exhibited good concordance, especially for the placebo arm. In the canagliflozin arm, modest underprediction was observed for myocardial infarction, along with overprediction of dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine, and all-cause mortality. Discrimination was strong (0.85) for the renal outcomes, but weaker for the macrovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality (0.60–0.68). The model performed well in internal and external validation exercises. Conclusion CREDEM-DKD is an important new tool in the evaluation of treatment interventions in the DKD population. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02065791. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-020-00923-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

ISSN :
18696961 and 18696953
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Diabetes Therapy
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....907ae2d6e4ce6a934c8675611a5dc16b