Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized clinical split-mouth study on the performance of CAD/CAM-partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement or a universal adhesive and a conventional resin cement after 39 months
- Source :
- Scholz, Konstantin J; Tabenski, Isabelle M; Vogl, Vanessa; Cieplik, Fabian; Schmalz, Gottfried; Buchalla, Wolfgang; Hiller, Karl-Anton; Federlin, Marianne (2021). Randomized clinical split-mouth study on the performance of CAD/CAM-partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement or a universal adhesive and a conventional resin cement after 39 months. Journal of dentistry, 115, p. 103837. Elsevier Science 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103837
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Elsevier Science, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Objectives To determine the clinical performance of partial ceramic crowns (PCCs) luted with a conventional resin cement combined with a universal adhesive without or with selective enamel etching or luted with a self-adhesive resin cement. Methods In a split-mouth design, each three CAD/CAM-PCCs (Vita Mark II, Cerec) were placed in 50 patients. Two PCCs were luted with a conventional resin cement (RelyX Ultimate) combined with a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) without (SB-E) or with (SB+E) selective enamel etching. The third PCC was luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem 2; RXU). Chi-square tests (�����0.05) were applied. Based on clinical failures (complete debonding or need for replacement of the restorations), Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results 31 patients were evaluated clinically using FDI criteria at 39 months. Clinically acceptable results were detected over time, except for "fracture of material and retention" (inacceptable fractures and debondings). Within materials, statistically significant differences (p�������0.003) between baseline and 39 months were found for "marginal adaptation" and "marginal staining". At 39-month, SB+E and SB-E showed significantly better results compared to RXU in "marginal adaptation"(p�������0.021) and "marginal staining"(p�������0.013). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher survival rates after 39 months for SB+E (96%) and SB-E (88%) compared to RXU (69%) with statistically significant differences between RXU vs. SB-E (p��=��0.022) and RXU vs. SB+E (p�������0.001). Conclusions After 39-months, PCCs luted with the self-adhesive resin cement exhibited a statistically significant inferior survival rate compared to restorations luted with the conventional resin cement combined with a universal adhesive without or with selective enamel etching. Clinical significance Currently, self-adhesive resin cements cannot be recommended for luting partial ceramic crowns. However, the standard adhesive luting procedure comprising a universal adhesive and luting composite yielded good clinical results for more than 3 years irrespectively of application of a selective enamel etching step.
- Subjects :
- Ceramics
Materials science
RelyX Unicem
Surface Properties
610 Medizin
Dental Cements
Dentistry
610 Medicine & health
Acid Etching, Dental
CEREC
stomatognathic system
Materials Testing
Humans
Ceramic
Dental Enamel
General Dentistry
Resin cement
ddc:610
Crowns
Enamel paint
business.industry
Clinical performance
technology, industry, and agriculture
Partial ceramic crowns
Self-adhesive resin cements
Universal adhesive
CAD/CAM
Clinical study
Selective enamel etching
Resin Cements
Self adhesive
visual_art
visual_art.visual_art_medium
Adhesive
business
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Scholz, Konstantin J; Tabenski, Isabelle M; Vogl, Vanessa; Cieplik, Fabian; Schmalz, Gottfried; Buchalla, Wolfgang; Hiller, Karl-Anton; Federlin, Marianne (2021). Randomized clinical split-mouth study on the performance of CAD/CAM-partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement or a universal adhesive and a conventional resin cement after 39 months. Journal of dentistry, 115, p. 103837. Elsevier Science 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103837 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103837>
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....913ecbc0d5014723a66c9aeb05e4982d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.48350/164009