Back to Search Start Over

Association of pretreatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with improvement in ablation outcome in atrial fibrillation patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction

Authors :
Sanghamitra Mohanty
Chintan Trivedi
Andrea Natale
John Burkhardt
Rodney Horton
Shane Bailey
Luigi Di Biase
Joseph G. Gallinghouse
Amin Al-Ahmad
Javier Sanchez
Prasant Mohanty
Rong Bai
Patrick Hranitzky
Carola Gianni
Source :
Heart Rhythm. 12:1963-1971
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF).The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of upstream ACEI therapy on postablation AF recurrence and hospitalization in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).Three hundred forty-five consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation with low LVEF (≤45%) were classified into group 1 (ACEI+, n = 187 [54%], of whom 44 patients [23.5%] had paroxysmal AF [PAF]) or group 2 (ACEI-, n = 158 [46%]; 31 of these 158 patients [19.6%] had PAF). Additionally, 703 consecutive patients with LVEF45% undergoing first AF ablation were included for a secondary analysis to evaluate the effect of ACEI treatment in normal ejection fraction. In group 1, ACEI therapy started ≥3 months before ablation and continued through follow-up.Baseline characteristics were similar except for hypertension, which was significantly more prevalent in ACEI+ (71% vs 51%, P.001). At 24 ± 7 months of follow-up, 109 nonparoxysmal AF patients in group 1 (76%) and 81 (64%) in group 2 (P = .015) were recurrence free. In multivariate analysis, ACEI therapy was an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio for ACEI-, 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.7; P = .026]. However, among PAF patients, ACEI use was not associated with ablation success (80% vs 77% in ACEI+ and ACEI-, respectively; P = .82). In the normal-EF population, the success rates between ACEI+ and ACEI- cohorts were similar (71% vs 74%, P = .31). After the index procedure, 17 patients (9.1%) in the ACEI+ group and 28 (17.7%) in the ACEI- cohort (P= .02) required rehospitalization, for a 49% relative risk reduction (relative risk 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.90).Preablation use of an ACEI is associated with improvement in ablation outcome in patients with nonparoxysmal AF with low LVEF.

Details

ISSN :
15475271
Volume :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Heart Rhythm
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....91669f5e3815ad76767dc6569f3c8d95
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.007