Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical predictors of achalasia
- Source :
- Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. 23(1)
- Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- SUMMARY Limited access to esophageal manometry (EM) may delay identification and treatment of patients with achalasia. In order to assess predictors to fast-track patients for manometric confirmation of achalasia, we compared the clinical, radiographic, and endoscopic characteristics of achalasia patients to patients with functional dysphagia without manometric features of achalasia (controls). Patients referred for esophageal manometry to assess functional dysphagia prospectively identified over a 12-month period were asked to participate in this study. The Achalasia Symptom Questionnaire (ASQ), a structured 11-question survey (score: 0–best, 67–worst), was completed by all consenting patients. ASQ scores, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and upper gastro-intestinal (UGI) contrast study findings were compared between patents with subsequently confirmed achalasia and those in whom achalasia was excluded by EM. Univariate logistic regression identified predictors that were tested by multivariate logistic regression to generate the model. Of the 803 EM performed over this 12-month period, 95 patients were referred specifically to assess functional dysphagia. Of these, 50 were confirmed to have achalasia, and 45 had dysphagia without manometric evidence for achalasia and hence comprised the control group. ASQ scores were higher in achalasia patients (37 ± 13 versus 23 ± 10). Endoscopy and/or contrast esophagogram reports were available in 92% achalasia patients and 80% controls. Significant predictors for achalasia identified on univariate logistic regression included ASQ score, abnormal findings on endoscopy, and contrast UGI study. Using multivariate logistic regression, we were able to accurately predict the probability of achalasia to be P where P = ey/(1 + ey) and y =−5.6 + (0.089 × ASQ) + (2.088 × EGD) + (3.083 × UGI), e = exponential constant 2.7182, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and UGI = 0 if normal and 1 if abnormal. Dropping the predictor ASQ, the formula changes to y =−2.7 + (1.987 × EGD) + (2.861 × UGI). Using only noninvasive investigations (i.e. eliminating EGD), the formula changes to y =−4.9653 + (0.0951 × ASQ) + (3.4312 × UGI). The probability of achalasia can be calculated in patients with functional dysphagia based on clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic findings allowing for a prioritization of EM studies.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Manometry
Radiography
Achalasia
Contrast Media
Logistic regression
digestive system
Gastroenterology
Models, Biological
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Limited access
Esophagus
Internal medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
otorhinolaryngologic diseases
medicine
Humans
In patient
Prospective Studies
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
General Medicine
medicine.disease
Dysphagia
digestive system diseases
Endoscopy
Esophageal Achalasia
Case-Control Studies
Multivariate Analysis
medicine.symptom
business
Deglutition Disorders
Dilatation, Pathologic
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14422050
- Volume :
- 23
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....928db74b967c550dc959e4f29cd249cc