Dr. Uhre et al. Reply

Authors :: Janus Christian Jakobsen
Kerstin J. Plessen
Nicole Nadine Lønfeldt
Signe Vangkilde
Camilla Funch Uhre
Valdemar Funch Uhre
Linea Pretzmann
Christian Gluud
Anne Katrine Pagsberg
Source :: Uhre, V F, Uhre, C F, Lønfeldt, N N, Pretzmann, L, Vangkilde, S, Plessen, K J, Gluud, C, Jakobsen, J C & Pagsberg, A K 2020, ' Dr. Uhre et al. Reply: ', Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 787-791 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.04.013
Publication Year :: 2020
Publisher :: Elsevier BV, 2020.
Abstract: In a recent letter to the editor, a group of clinician-researchers posit that the conclusions in our published systematic review1 on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are based on inappropriate methodology. In this reply, we address the concerns expressed by Storch et al.2