Back to Search Start Over

Contribution of the OC Sensor® immunoassay in comparison to the Hemoccult II® guaiac-test in organized colorectal cancer screening

Authors :
Nathanaëlle Cornet
Patrick Saulnier
Anne-Sophie Banaszuk
Carole Vitellius
Sandrine Bertrais
Isabelle Deherce
François-Xavier Caroli-Bosc
Margot Laly
Hémodynamique, Interaction Fibrose et Invasivité tumorales Hépatiques (HIFIH)
Université d'Angers (UA)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (CHU Angers)
PRES Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (UNAM)
CAP-Santé 49, Angers
Micro et Nanomédecines Translationnelles (MINT)
Université d'Angers (UA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
European Journal of Epidemiology, European Journal of Epidemiology, Springer Verlag, 2019, 34 (2), pp.163-172. ⟨10.1007/s10654-018-0471-z⟩
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.

Abstract

International audience; Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related death of worldwide with high incidence and mortality rate, accessible to a screening program in France, first with guaiac- based fecal occult blood test (g-FOBT) then with fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), since 2015, because of better accuracy. The aim of our study was to compare the characteristics of screen-detected lesions in two successive CRC screening campaigns, using two different tests (Hemoccult II® and OC Sensor®) in the department of Maine-et-Loire, and to precise the performance of these tests [participation rate, detection rates (DR), positive predictive value (PPV)]. Participants, invited by CAP SANTE 49, with polyps or cancer at the colonoscopy after a positive screening test between 01/01/2013 and 31/12/2016 were included. A guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (g-FOBT) was used from January 2013 to December 2014 and a FIT was used from June 2015 to December 2016). 2575 participants, 642 in g-FOBT group and 1933 in FIT group had lesions. Participation rate was not different between tests (p = 0.104), whereas DR and PPV were statistically higher in FIT for all lesions (2.61, 95% CI [2.50-2.70] vs 0.93, 95% CI [0.90-1.00], p

Details

ISSN :
15737284 and 03932990
Volume :
34
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Epidemiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....930e70898f105f6370953c18f5167f56
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0471-z